Originally posted by enoeske My topic was closed and there was no flaming or anything. It doesn't seem as its allowed by other admins.
OK, here's the thing. IN the opinion of many, DPR is not fair accurate or scientific, but they are devious. It takes a lot of work by forum members to straighten out what they do. And then we get them inspiring folks like MJKloski, who require a lot more effort to dispel.
So given the amount of work required by discussing them, where is the review as posted on DPR that would make discussing them further worth the pain?
I've totally given up on them. But if you can find some "socially redeeming importance" I'll be happy to change my mind. If you want to discuss them, it should be on you to correct their devious anti-Pentax slant. Are you willing to do that?
Personally, i find their brand of pseudo science hogwash to be repulsive. As in sickening.
Make your case. What does DPR bring to the table that isn't done better and more honestly by other sites?
Anyone wants to discuss DPR can do it over there, wait, no you can't. they'll censor you then ban you. They are the Adolh Hitlers of photography websites.
I mean what kind of people defame product on line and then delete and ban criticism of their work. Evil people. Evil I say.
The first goal of evil individuals, is to try and eliminate legitimate dissent. These individuals are so weak, the tiny little bit of power they have has corrupted them.