Originally posted by pakinjapan -Lens-
1. Will Pentax consider doing something like DFA limited WR?
Look at the FA limited or DFA100wr, they are what I am talking about.
Why do I ask this?
We have seen pancake size non WR DA limited at the expenses of speed. I don’t think FA20 f2.8 is big. I used to have one and now I have DA21 but still wish Pentax make DA21 f2.8 or f2 WR at the size of FA20. Why not? WR body makes absolutely no sense with non WR lenses.
We have seen the optic nearly perfect DFA*50 and a few more in the roadmap with an expense of enormous size, weight, and price. This seems to be what everyone is doing. But Pentax is not well known for following what everyone in the industry is doing.
It will be nice if Pentax try something in the middle, not too big too expensive optical nearly perfect but also not compromise WR and speed just to get to the pancake size. FA limited is in the sweet spot.
I also love your idea and vote a +1 on it.
I already suggested that to them somewhere on FB i think...
Just revive the analogue style a bit... cram in loads of rounded aperture blades (at least 10-11) make all of them weather resistant
and call those lenses
"Takumar-D"
Those lenses would sell like hotcake.
The DA 20-40mm DC WR is a perfect example how such lenses could look like...
The design just a bit more like original Takumars pls (instead of this Voigtlander look) and also bigger of course to cover Full-Frame and those lenses would be good to go.
Calling them "TAKUMARs" again would draw a lot of attention, believe me... That just how peoples hungry minds work.