Originally posted by ThorSanchez
I'm amazed because I can't say I've ever seen one in the wild.
That does not mean much though.
I have never seen even a single macro photographer or macro lens out in the wild.
I have never seen a wedding photographer "out in the wild".
Yet they are said to exist.
The instant cameras produce very small format prints, which are not good for landscapes but very good for people close by. Basically it is "portraits only".
Reading comments from users those cameras are for parties, weddings, other social events and similar things where you join friends. That typically would be indoors.
So unless you spend a lot of time indoors on hip young people events, chances are you'll never see one.
They wont be taking images of the Eiffel tower.
---------- Post added 7th Dec 2018 at 07:56 ----------
Originally posted by ThorSanchez that $1 a picture plus $50-200 for a camera to get poor 1970s nostalgia photos is insane
I guess it is perception.
You can also see it as $1 for a physical memory of that fun moment with friend X; without time wasted for sitting down on PC or smartphone to develop an image and then having to do the extra step to print it with a much more costly printer.
And it "is insane" to spend 4-digit numbers of money on electronic toys which only produce bits and bytes and you have to spend hours to get to the real image and invest more to print it. A huge PITA. The results then are not better in any meaningful way. The memory of the fun moment will not be any better, just because it has 1600 lines/mm.