Originally posted by Wheatfield Hoya made no bones about not wanting the photographic imaging division.
I've heard this as well. Interesting how corporate culture is so different between Western and Japanese companies.
Honour needs to be considered and it seems the Pentax board were proud of their brand and wanted to continue development.
For me, it seems, that capitalism would dictate that as long as your stakeholders make bank there is little to consider towards what the purchaser decides to do with their purchase haha I'm no MBA.
Originally posted by Wheatfield but they did just enough to keep the brand viable until a buyer was found.
This is an interesting perspective, and you are probably accurate.
My initial thoughts while reading your comments were contrary; they did more than 'just' enough to keep the brand viable:
They expanded the lineup, they developed the Q system, the 645 system, they released frequent aps-c cameras, they implemented weather sealing, they rumored full frame camera early and even released full frame lenses...
but on second thought... that may all just have been bolstering the resume of the company before intended sell off.. if they didn't bolster to some extent then resale wouldn't be as viable.
Interesting I've never heard of the many failings of the K-5. Mine is still clickin' just fine. Care to elaborate?
Originally posted by Wheatfield The Ricoh originated product seems to be very good quality.
I entirely agree. Ricoh products are impressive and leading in their field. I'm very excited to see what they have in store for Pentax!