Originally posted by Sidney Porter
The belief that these videos would lead about vintage lenses within the first minute seems like an unreasonable expectation.Part of this marketing is to showcase that the camera is on the cutting edge of dslr. That is opposite of focusing backward compatibility.
I understand your point of view, even if I disagree with it. I have a K-5. Lots of cameras have come out since that are better. Certain features in the newer models have been tempting, like focus peaking, better AF, and for the K-1, being able to use FF lenses as FF lenses. But despite the increases in megapixels, some AF advances etc, nothing has strongly compelled me to consider buying another body. I can't even say I need one, since photography is just a hobby for me. But when you combine all the latest cutting edge features of the K3-III, in addition to what it adds to using legacy glass, I can see a quantum step forward in why I might want to upgrade. And it also gives me a compelling reason why I might favour it over a K1. There's no shortage of videos out now touting the K3-III - and kudos to Pentax for getting it into the hands of so many photographers - and many of these only focus on the cutting edge. So hearing a different perspective is also of value.