Stewart
I find it interesting that after taking Mike Riley to task for supposedly misrepresenting the incident that Mr. Kerzic underwent, you went ahead and also misrepresented his version of the event..
You are correct in that I saw no mention of a dog in any of the stories on the three links that Mike and you provided..I thought I read them carefully, so if I missed the part about the dog, "I'm sorry Mike"..
Mr. Kerzic clearly states in the letter he wrote to Amtrak, that you provided the link for, that he never saw a No Trespassing sign on the day of the incident..And, that the sign shown to him by Sgt. Taylor, hours later, was not in a place which he had accessed during his trip into Penn Station earlier that day..He also clearly states that he had no recollection of ever seeing a No Trespassing sign on any occasion that he had been in Penn Station..While Mr. Kerzic was on the platform that had a No Trespassing sign posted on it, he clearly states in his letter to Amtrak that the sign was not visible to him as he got off of the train..
While Mr. Kerzic does not explicitly state so in his letter to Amtrak, I can assume that at some point in his conversation with the two officers that one of them informed him that they were going to arrest him..I also assume that it was at this point that he decided that his arrest was imminent, and that placing his hands behind his back voluntarily was the path of least resistance, and the best thing to do..The way that you have worded that portion of your post regarding his hands, highlighting
without being asked, comes across to me as a way of implying that Mr. Kerzic was guilty, instead of just stating what he wrote in his letter to Amtrak..
You are correct in that we do not know the officers version of this event..We never have the officers version of any event like this because they are not allowed to speak publicly about anything that they do..What I do not understand about you is that you are always coming to the defense of the police in threads like this..You always seem to think that the police can do no wrong..I have known enough cops to know that most of the ones I have met will stretch and break the law on occasion if they think they can get away with it..
Although I am not an officer of the law, and I have never had the privilege of being arrested, I do know that cops have the proper way to handcuff someone drummed into their heads during their training to become a police officer..If a person is handcuffed improperly it is because the officer in question does so deliberately..Even a rookie cop straight out of the academy rides with a training officer whose responsibility is to see to it that things like handcuffing someone incorrectly does not occur..Even if we assume that Officer Rusbarsky was a rookie on his first day of duty, it was the other officer's responsibility to correct him about the proper way to handcuff Mr. Kerzic, and how tight those handcuff should be..
Finally, just because he was on a platform does not mean that he had not taken any images of the train he had just disembarked from that contained a current Amtrak logo..He was on the platform, he has just gotten off the train, so why would you be so quick to assume that he had not taken legitimate photographs of the train with its logo??..
Mike might have been wrong about the dog in relation to this incident with Mr. Kerzic..I can see nothing else in his post that differed from Mr. Kerzic's account in his letter to Amtrak..You, however have written your post so as to imply that Mr. Kerzic was guilty of trespassing..
Mike is right in that this is another in a long line of incidents that are still reflecting the hysteria and stupidity resulting from various government agencies reactions to the 9-11 bombings..We photographers need to force them to "Get over it", and move on..There are damn few instances that I can think of where ANY form of photography will pose any more of a threat than obstructing someones passage, or view..Like, with a tripod mounted camera..All the rest is just a bunch of whitewash intended to obscure the fact that 7 plus years after 9-11 we are still no safer than we were on September 10, 2001..
Last edited by baltochef920; 01-01-2009 at 09:16 PM.