Originally posted by beholder3 No loss.
I have never seen a single photo made with a Zeiss lens that had anything special about it.
Not to mention the abysmal cost/benefit ratio.
Reading between the lines, it almost sounds as if you won't miss them, then?
Aside from my vintage glass, I only own one modern-day Zeiss... the Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 ZA Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* (SAL-2470Z) in A-mount (first released in 2008, I believe). In terms of build quality, it's the best AF lens I own (if a little on the heavy side). In terms of image quality, it's the best zoom lens I own with a great mix of sharpness, nice rendering, minimal distortion, minimal CA and minimal vignetting at all focal lengths and apertures (even wide open). As for AF, it's the fastest-focusing non-screw-drive lens I own - it's quick... very quick... and always accurate. Overall, it's one of the best lenses I've ever owned, and
by far the best zoom lens I own.
Imaging Resource concluded:
Quote: I'm not one to gush, but there's really only one way to end this review - with glowing praise. The Sony 24-70mm ƒ/2.8 offers truly exquisite optical performance, and mounted on an Alpha body with in-camera image stabilization, you're looking at a truly remarkable platform for creating excellent images. If you think you need this lens and can afford it, it's a very easy decision to make.
I'm not sure how much of the credit should go to Zeiss, Sony and/or Cosina, but they knocked it out of the park with that lens.
Of course, like your statements above, these are just my (and Imaging Resource's) subjective opinions.
If it's true Zeiss is dropping out of the photography business, personally I think it's a real shame... They were a huge force and influence in lens design and development since the 1890s. It's sad to see that part of their history come to a close...