Originally posted by rawr In one of the Newson interviews he was asked why there was no viewfinder. He said it wasn't in the brief - he wasn't asked to put one into the design.
If Pentax had said - make a design that includes a viewfinder, the K-01 design would have featured a viewfinder.
Similarly, Pentax insisted on using the same battery as the K-5/K-7, apparently, rather than a smaller one as Newson originally wanted, and of course that he had to design the whole camera around K-mount. So the primary parameters for the design were set by the client, including whether the camera needed to include a VF or not. A designer can exercise his creativity, but they can't usually be given carte blanche, particularly in industrial design.
+1. Pentax is solely responsible for the design and manufacture of its cameras. If they didn't like the design Newson created, they could have easily said: go back and add a VF. So get beyond the grief process, it is what it is.
Our resp. as discerning photographers, is to decide if this tool meets our needs. If it does, buy it if you wish, if not, don't buy or buy something else. No big deal either way.
It appears from available rumours that a replacement Kr is going to be announced or shown this month. If they put the 16 mpx sensor in the K01, i believe they will put the same sensor in the replacement for the Kr. So if folks don't like the K01, they can wait because within a month we will see the replacement Kr which will have liveview and a VF.
It doesn't bother me to use the LCD during liveview on my K5 or the lcd on my Canon PS, so why would the lack of a VF bother me on the K01. We need to know more about how easy this camera is to use and its IQ, but I might buy a K01 down the road. On the other hand, it might not have some K5 features i really like, e.g. a separate AF button, that i would find more of a problem than the VF. we'll have to wait and see.