It wont bother me if I do. I would love to see Pentax be successful. I would love to see them grow and put competitive products on the market. That is the problem. I don't see them releasing competitive products. The K-5 is a strong camera. The Q and K-01 are pretty weak. The K-01 has the same 16MP sensor as the K-5, but so does the NEX-5N and the Sony A55 which also compete in this market at a similar price point. I'm 90% sure that the Fuji XP1 has he same Sony sensor with a different color array and low-pass filter. The 16MP Sony sensor is practically a commodity item right now.
Legacy lens support is only relevant to a small number of people. Pentax has maybe 4% market share and maybe 1/2 of those people care about mirror-less, and maybe 1/2 of those people care about keeping the K-mount.
I think the Pentax K-01 will bomb relative to the offerings from Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, & Fuji.
People seem to think that the Pentax will sell very well because of its price, but at that price point there are a lot competition. The Sony A55 (same sensor) with 18-55 zoom sells for $800.00. There are a lot of competitive products at this price point. Many with better features.
Fuji will sell more, because even at $1,700 for just the body it is a very unique product. It has better IQ than the 5DII in a smaller package. At $1,700 Fuji is competing against higher end products that actually cost more. And if a Fuji user wants to use a 77mm LTD all they need to do is buy an adapter.