Originally posted by DarrenCax Both probably performed superbly outdoors, but my primary use will be indoors, no flash, using standard house-hold lighting.
Okay, call me an old dinosaur, but this isn't the way cameras were meant to be used. It was unheard of in film days, and even in the early days of digital. Camera makers are trying to catch up with this, to me, artificial demand, but they're not quite there yet. Seems like a waste of manufacturers' resources trying to cater to people who aren't really serious about photography (if all they want to do is shoot household objects indoors under naked incandescent or fluorescent light).
I would rather they addressed the issue of blown-out highlights with more headroom at the upper end of the sensitivity curve, but internet clamor seems to be running in the opposite direction.