Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-24-2012, 01:30 PM   #1
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Fresno, CA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 50
Should I get a K-01 or wait for the K-30?

I have a K-r...and love it. When it works...

I'm seeing the major differences being mirror-less with no viewfinder. What's the benefits / cons with that? Shorter battery life? Thanks in advance.

05-24-2012, 02:10 PM   #2
Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Liverpool, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 12,285
The K-30 has 2 e-dials and a true TAv mode. That is a major advantage over the K-01. Another major advantage is the weather sealing. The K-30 has much faster AF than the K-01. The K-01 can focus peak during video recording, the K-30 can't. The K-01 has HDMI output and a microphone jack, the K-30 doesn't. The K-01 uses the same battery as the K-5, the K-30 can use AAs. The K-30 will have a much shorter battery life than the K-01.

The K-01 is a video camera that can take good stills. The K-30 is a still camera that can take video.
05-24-2012, 02:27 PM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2011
Location: Southern California
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,082
I think the the K-30 might have a much better battery life if you use the OVF and turn off the display.
05-24-2012, 03:03 PM   #4
hcc
Pentaxian
hcc's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,482
Tough question: K-30 or K-01?

If you like a dSLR like camera, wait for the K-30. If you want a smaller body, almost a P&S, go for the K-01.

I have both K-7 and K-01, and the K-01 is a great secondary camera with excellent video capability. Would I use the K-01 as my primary camera? No. I like the functionality of the K-7 and I would replace it by a K-5 or its successor in due time.

Battery wise: the K-30 does not have a battery grip. If you want extended battery capabiity, go for the K-5 with battery grip.

Hope that the comment may help.

05-24-2012, 06:02 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Anvh's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,616
The K-01 also have a TAv like mode so won't call that something negative over the k-01 for not having a dictated mode for that.

It really comes down if you want to shoot in RAW and if you want a viewfinder.
If it's yes to one of them get the K30 instead.

cons of no viewfinder... well try to look at the screen in full sunlight, it doesnt work also longer lenses are harder to controll on the K-01 and shoter battery life
05-24-2012, 07:18 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wellington
Posts: 969
If you shoot video go for the K-01- otherwise go with the K30 - simple

However if you see yourself getting more into Photography get the K30 - I got the K7 when I started out over the Kx and the feel/controls make the camera.

The K-01 does have its plus points. It makes a fantastic compactER camera if you have a fullsized DSLR camera already, or a high quality prime machine, for people with an extensive P&S background.
05-24-2012, 08:38 PM   #7
Senior Member




Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 106
Different cameras, the best depends on your needs. I have a K-r and a K-01. Battery wise they are both great, and the K-30 should be the same as the K-r on this matter as the battery is the same. IQ wise it should be equal to the K-01 ( they have the same sensor), which is better than the K-r. Now what do you want? Size? OVF? WR? Do you use many teles? What about video? Do you shoot manual? With this info I can give you a proper recommendation.

One thing about the K-01: it takes great pictures, not just great video. Also it's very usable under full sunlight. Together with a small prime it's a great package to always cary around. Oh yeah it also shoots RAW.
05-24-2012, 10:19 PM   #8
Veteran Member
Anvh's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 4,616
QuoteOriginally posted by luizpaulo Quote
Oh yeah it also shoots RAW.
But there is a limitation that nearly cripples it, you can only take 1 photo every second.
For still life photography no problem but for the rest... nah.

05-25-2012, 12:41 PM   #9
Lens Buying Addict
monochrome's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kirkwood (St. Louis) MO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 19,435
QuoteOriginally posted by Anvh Quote
But there is a limitation that nearly cripples it, you can only take 1 photo every second.
For still life photography no problem but for the rest... nah.
If you need to shoot more the 1fps in RAW, go head and get the K30. If you don't the choice isn't so clear.

I'd wait until July 9th to make a final decision - see what the actual capabilities are (then again, I pre-ordered the K-01 and received it day three of issue).
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
k-01, k01, mirrorless, pentax k-01
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
should I or wait? varyabol Pentax K-5 27 01-11-2012 05:40 PM
Wait wait wait...Pentax Q vs K-r? noaslplease Pentax DSLR Discussion 37 06-27-2011 07:22 AM
Now I wait. Tim Wilson Pentax Medium Format 15 12-09-2010 03:39 PM
Night Shall we wait for the music? Zav Photo Critique 2 07-31-2010 09:18 AM
Do I get a K-x or do I wait? Confuzzled Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 18 07-15-2010 06:16 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top