Originally posted by cali92rs That is way too logical for camera manufacturers. They prefer arbitrary numbers with no meaning....oh and for some unknown reason, it is better to stick an X somewhere in the name.
Being a former Olympusian, I always was amused about the relation OM10 << OM1.
At least, OM4 > OM3 > OM2 > OM1 applied - whereas for Pentax, whether LX is > or < than MX (after all, M comes after L in the alphabet) was always weird.
Back on topic, though...I actually recently ordered another K-01. All said and done, the IQ is great, the ergonomics acceptable. What I would *really* like in a K-01+ would be (i) a second wheel (so as to have one for aperture and one for shutter), and (ii) a bigger internal buffer as I take pictures in raw only.
A K-01++ would, additionally, have GPS built-in and geotag the images.
A K-00 (which must be the logical, ultimate, pro camera ?) would be the ultimate zen experience. It'd take only RAW (no jpeg, no development into jpeg, ...) in max resolution, and have almost no menus. Rather, it would have a switch to turn on/off SR, a switch to go from Hyper-P to M, an AV+/- for exposure and an independent AV +/- for flash, a switch to hack on/off the GPS, and two wheels for aperture and shutter. No digital filters, no HDR, and all that other junk that I never use