Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-18-2013, 02:18 AM   #1
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 696
Fast cheap 28mm lens -- an impossible dream?

Staff note: This post may contain affiliate links, which means Pentax Forums may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. If you would like to support the forum directly, you may also make a donation here.


Just bought and am learning about my new K-01, and about APS-C photography. Coming to it from an Olympus XZ-1... with a much smaller sensor.

I enjoy low-light photography. But the camera gods giveth, and then taketh away, don't they? The XZ-1 has f/1.8 28mm equiv lens, but... because the sensor is small, you get a lot of noise over ISO 400. Then, there's the K-01. I can take a perfectly good picture at ISO 1600... but my 18-55 kit lens (27 - 85 equiv) starts at f/3.5 then goes to f/4.5 at 24mm (36 mm equiv) and so on.

So this got me looking -- and learning -- about Pentax lenses. Looking for a 28mm prime (42mm equiv) at f/1.8, or f/2. Well, forget that one! VERY expensive... like the 31mm (47mm equiv) f/1.8 Pentax sells for $1300. And that's dollars, not pesos, unfortunately. Wow!

Photography. There's no free lunch, is there? The bigger the film or sensor, the larger the lens to cover it, and then much more costly glass -- even more costly to stay up with new high-res sensors.

Side notes -- thought maybe I could stick Nikon lenses on the K-01. You can, sort of... old non-AI lenses will go on but not click into place. And you can get an optical adapter (with its own lens) for AI and newer lenses... but. The adapter lens adds a stop, or 1.5 stops, and you are back where you started.

But I am buying a $50 brass adapter to mount medium-format lenses. They are so sharp on my 645N... figure it's worth a try to see if they stay sharp on the K-01. Again, a big trade-off... a 2.6X crop factor... that 75mm yields a 195mm field-of-view on the K-01.

Solution? Write your Congressman. Instead of millions for lithium-ion batteries that light up Dreamliners, how about a national project to develop a $200 K-mount 28mm f/1.4 lens? Yes!!!

02-18-2013, 02:48 AM   #2
Forum Member
PLC3's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Berlin
Posts: 54
QuoteOriginally posted by jon404 Quote
Just bought and am learning about my new K-01, and about APS-C photography. Coming to it from an Olympus XZ-1... with a much smaller sensor.

I enjoy low-light photography. But the camera gods giveth, and then taketh away, don't they? The XZ-1 has f/1.8 28mm equiv lens, but... because the sensor is small, you get a lot of noise over ISO 400. Then, there's the K-01. I can take a perfectly good picture at ISO 1600... but my 18-55 kit lens (27 - 85 equiv) starts at f/3.5 then goes to f/4.5 at 24mm (36 mm equiv) and so on.

So this got me looking -- and learning -- about Pentax lenses. Looking for a 28mm prime (42mm equiv) at f/1.8, or f/2. Well, forget that one! VERY expensive... like the 31mm (47mm equiv) f/1.8 Pentax sells for $1300. And that's dollars, not pesos, unfortunately. Wow!

Photography. There's no free lunch, is there? The bigger the film or sensor, the larger the lens to cover it, and then much more costly glass -- even more costly to stay up with new high-res sensors.

Side notes -- thought maybe I could stick Nikon lenses on the K-01. You can, sort of... old non-AI lenses will go on but not click into place. And you can get an optical adapter (with its own lens) for AI and newer lenses... but. The adapter lens adds a stop, or 1.5 stops, and you are back where you started.

But I am buying a $50 brass adapter to mount medium-format lenses. They are so sharp on my 645N... figure it's worth a try to see if they stay sharp on the K-01. Again, a big trade-off... a 2.6X crop factor... that 75mm yields a 195mm field-of-view on the K-01.

Solution? Write your Congressman. Instead of millions for lithium-ion batteries that light up Dreamliners, how about a national project to develop a $200 K-mount 28mm f/1.4 lens? Yes!!!
Have you tried looking for the K or A 28mm f2s? They seem to be quite rare but get excellent reviews in the lens database.
02-18-2013, 02:58 AM   #3
Veteran Member
ihasa's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Midlands
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,066
There are Sigma 24 and 28mm f1.8s, and a 30mm f1.4.
02-18-2013, 04:23 AM   #4
Veteran Member




Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 322
Hi jon404
I've just added a new thread which somewhat crosses over with yours...if you wanted to have a look...
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/215852-vivitar...us-series.html
Cheers
Dean

02-18-2013, 04:24 AM   #5
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Carolina
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,720
QuoteOriginally posted by jon404 Quote
Solution? Write your Congressman. Instead of millions for lithium-ion batteries that light up Dreamliners, how about a national project to develop a $200 K-mount 28mm f/1.4 lens? Yes!!!
If Samyang can't make a fast wide angle for $200 while leaving out modern features like auto focus, what makes you think Pentax can?
Samyang 24mm f/1.4 ED AS UMC Wide-Angle Lens for Pentax SY24M-P

Little less wide at 35mm, but still f1.4 and way over $200.
Samyang 35mm f/1.4 Wide-Angle US UMC Aspherical Lens SY35M-P B&H
02-18-2013, 05:01 AM   #6
Veteran Member
Louicio's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 432
If you want to go faster than 2.8 you more than likely will need to save your pennies, more than $200 anyway. You could get an older 28mm f2.8 for less than your price but probably be manual focus.

With the K-01 don't be afraid to bump up the ISO if needed, it will perform admirably.
02-18-2013, 05:30 AM   #7
Veteran Member
Na Horuk's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Slovenia, probably
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,186
Yeah, with the K-01 you have two useful features: good high ISO performance (so you don't need really fast lenses, except if you are shooting in dark places) and focus peaking (which can be a useful tool to help with manual focusing)
If a lens is really fast, it needs to sacrifice some other things. AF, distortion, aberration, sharpness.. So getting a f2.8 or even a f3.5 lens is nothing terrible and usually means you can use it perfectly well wide open (with many super fast lenses, their performance wide open is not that great)

But yes, I am also surprised that 28mm lenses tend to not be very fast. 24mm and 35mm lenses tend to be faster (and have better IQ?), I guess the 28mm focal length just never was that popular for the lens manufacturers to put a lot of design effort into them. Maybe this will slowly change, with APS-C becoming so popular.

02-18-2013, 05:54 AM   #8
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Syracuse, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,477
The lens designer's dilemma...

Fast - Cheap - Good, pick two.
02-18-2013, 07:22 AM   #9
Veteran Member
vladimiroltean's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,465
QuoteOriginally posted by Na Horuk Quote
But yes, I am also surprised that 28mm lenses tend to not be very fast. 24mm and 35mm lenses tend to be faster (and have better IQ?), I guess the 28mm focal length just never was that popular for the lens manufacturers to put a lot of design effort into them. Maybe this will slowly change, with APS-C becoming so popular.
Whaaat? 28mm must be the most popular focal length for wide angles (old ones at least).
To the OP: What's wrong with the f/2.8 anyway? Seriously.

QuoteOriginally posted by boriscleto Quote
The lens designer's dilemma...
Fast - Cheap - Good, pick two.
That's a good one - it's old but never stops being funny.
02-18-2013, 08:53 AM   #10
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 511
Well, you can find faster 28mm lenses on Ebay. Never bid on a 28mm by itself although I did pick up a 28mm 2.5 in a lot quite a while back.

Here is a Vivitar 28mm f2.0 that only has a day left. Bet it will probably go for less than 200. Only up to $30 right now.
Vivitar 28mm F2 Lens for Pentax PK F2 0 Wide | eBay

And there is also a Kiron 28mm f2 with a BIN price of $195
Pentax K Fit Kiron 28mm F2 Multi Coated Fast Wide Angle Lens | eBay
02-18-2013, 09:54 AM   #11
Veteran Member
demp10's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Atlanta
Photos: Albums
Posts: 602
If F2.5 is fast enough for you, then take a look at the Tamron Adaptall 28mm F2.5. It is a great little lens. I found one in "Ugly" condition for less than $2 and still is very sharp.

Here is the review Tamron Adaptall-2 28mm f/2.5 (02B) Lens Reviews - Tamron Adaptall Lenses - Pentax Lens Review Database
02-18-2013, 11:14 AM   #12
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2012
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 696
Original Poster
Thanks all -- I'm getting an older 28mm f/2.8 manual, and, as you've said, it will do fine. This morning, learned the Focus Peaking and magnification with the e-dial in Manual Focus mode... absolutely amazing, you can't miss. Great camera!
02-18-2013, 12:00 PM   #13
Veteran Member
audiobomber's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Photos: Albums
Posts: 6,806
QuoteOriginally posted by jon404 Quote
Thanks all -- I'm getting an older 28mm f/2.8 manual, and, as you've said, it will do fine. This morning, learned the Focus Peaking and magnification with the e-dial in Manual Focus mode... absolutely amazing, you can't miss. Great camera!
For the small difference in cost, I recommend an A lens over full manual.
02-18-2013, 01:30 PM   #14
New Member




Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 23
For the particular specs you put forth, I would recommend the Sigma 28mm F1.8 EX DG. May not be in the sub $100 or less range, but for about $200 dollars I am happy with the results. It is a little on the big side though, or should I say not as compact as a Pentax prime. Otherwise go for a manual pentax K, M, or A and the Vivitar 28mm that many have recommended is also a great little 28mm.
02-18-2013, 02:23 PM   #15
Senior Member
klaus123's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 238
Hello

In that range of primes I have experiences with M28/2,8(MF) and Sigma 24/1,8 & 30/1,4.
All work well on the K01 - optically and speed the 30mm ist best (especialla in AL@3200ASA).
I like the 24 very much but on the K01 it is very bulky (Filter 77mm!!!)
For Street w/o using the screen he M28 might be good and it fits best from design point of view. (and I payed only about 25$ some years ago)

I analogue times wide angle lens an pentax had red number for apperture and distance - the combination of theese gave a good fix-focus combination... but I am acrais that this combination has only a more limited depth of field on Crop.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
28mm, 28mm lens, adapter, equiv, f/1.8, k-01, k01, lens, lenses, mirrorless, pentax k-01, photography, sensor

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any cheap 200mm fast cheap prime suggestions? tr13 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 32 03-08-2013 02:30 AM
Do you guys dream about having a dream lens? lightbulb Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 29 08-25-2012 08:11 AM
How fast of an SD card is fast enough? SammyLeopold Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 12 06-26-2012 02:24 PM
28-35mm Fast, Cheap Lens soppy Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 11 02-09-2012 09:13 AM
Cheap, fast wide angle PK Petri 2/28mm ovim Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 08-22-2009 10:21 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top