Veteran Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Melbourne, Australia Original Poster |
I disagree,..
A higher data rate for the MP4 CoDec means the processor is doing less compression, that frees up CPU time.
With the previous firmware updates allowing for use of a wider range of SD cards, and with most cheaper SD cards having less reliable maximum performance levels, I would not be surprised if the data rate has been held artificially low to allow for more reliability with any SD card, rather then performance with good SD Cards.
A higher data rate with better quality cards should not be a difficult proposition, I'll point to the success of Magic Lantern and C.H.D.K. as examples of what can be achieved with fixed hardware.
I for one, would happily choose to trade away wide SD Card compatibility, in return for higher performance with better cards.
With that reduced workload, other areas can take advantage of the Processor, like bumping the audio sample rate higher.
A lot of the updates I'll be hoping for (with the exception of HDMI out during recording) are little more then parameter alterations. Being able to choose your focus peaking colour will not use more resources when it comes to drawing the focus peaking on the screen in the current colour. Focus peaking during recording may.
Same goes for Click on, Click off for the exposure preview, or the shallow DoF when focus peaking is on during photo modes. In fact, I'd argue that turning off the ISO Ramping (AGC) for video shooting would free up quite a lot of processor time, again freeing resources for other uses.
Being able to insert a 'custom' image processing style, rather then editing the presets, would add no more processor overhead then applying one of the presets, but it would add some code to the firmware size, and hence to the amount of space in the memory buffer the firmware uses when it loads.
Alternative options for button assignment is not a big deal either.
Rob's suggestion of using the SR to drive a Tilt-Shift effect is interesting, and it may use more processor power, it's one that I'd suggest could be implemented for photos but not video.
I don't use Slave Flash equipment, so I'll leave that one alone. The GPS integration is about better code, not more code.
Regor's suggestion of WYSIWYG preview is the same as what I called 'Click on, Click off', and while active we're talking about switching off that ISO Ramping again, so back to reducing the processor workload.
One more thing I'd like to see, is Audio level meters on the display, not a huge change, a little extra load in the display overlay, but that could be traded by switching off other overlay items during recording.
This would be a huge plus on top of the K-01 already having adjustable audio input levels.
Now, as for the HDMI,.
And again I'll use the 'Canon' method, where in the 5D2 etc, only one video output display is available at a time, either the LCD, AV, or HDMI, well, I'd live with that if it's HDMI, as I could hook up an external recorder, so long as the output is a clean feed during recording, yes it's another bit of kit to buy, but it's on my shopping list anyway.
I don't have the USB-AV cable to see if there is analog video output during record modes, but if there is, and it's active while the LCD is, then the processing engine inside the K-01 is a lot more capable then a lot of the competition.
I really do hope the Engineers at Pentax do read these forums, I'm sure they'll have a few smiles about what K-01 owners have achieved, what I've seen of the images posted shows the camera really an underestimated piece of equipment.
All of the suggestion people are making so far would just turn it from being a 'good' camera, to an amazing one.
|