Praise in Vanity Fair for the K-01

johnmflores · 01-12-2015, 08:04 PM

The article says 2015 but I suspect it's a least one or two years old. FWIW, I won both clunkers mentioned in this story LOL.

Quote:

Or take the Pentax K-01, another unloved virgin, released only this February. Designed by Marc Newson, whose signature logo adorns the camera, the K-01 was a mirrorless model with a sweet APS-C sensor and packaged as a kit with a terrific pancake lens. (Pentax lenses have never gotten the hey-nonny-nonny of Leica or Zeiss glass but Pentax makes some dazzlers.) If the V1 was underdesigned and specc'd, the K-O1 was overbaked: a weighty, bulky camera with no EVF, not even an attachable one, and whose dials and choice of colors suggested a Tonka Toy with a lens. Personally, I found the blocky retro design intriguing, in part because of its almost lovable clunky chunky dorkiness and rejection of Apple-era snob cred, but a heavy camera hangs hard on the neck and that was a lot of money to pony up for a camera that might be a one-off, a corporate experiment that didn't pay off. As is apparently the case. No K-02 has been announced and the price of the original has plunged into the lower $400 range.

Which makes it attractive, considering that it takes the full range of Pentax K mount lenses and may be considered a collectible some day. I kind of want one, even though I can't justify it, but, really, what digital camera purchases can be justified?

Price Drop Jaw Drop | Vanity Fair

**clackers** · 01-12-2015, 09:30 PM

Big and with contrast detect AF only, but produces really good images from the ones people have posted around here.

yorik · 01-12-2015, 10:28 PM

Originally posted by johnmflores

The article says 2015 but I suspect it's a least one or two years old. FWIW, I won both clunkers mentioned in this story LOL.

The references to the recent release of the K-01 `this past February' and the `recently released' rx100 make it pretty clear that it is a digital reissue of a 2013 article. All the same, the advice is good - rushing out to buy the most recent release usually means spending an extra 10-15%, if not more. I bought the K-01 as a second K-mount body when the price dipped below $300. At that price, I can forgive its foibles and enjoy the excellent IQ.

Daedbird · 01-13-2015, 10:03 AM

...and let's not forget, I still feel the K-01 is the best Pentax for shooting video. Being able to use whatever mode you are in - and the settings - for shooting video is better than the K-3, which only uses a preset mode when you start shooting video. The K-3 is good for video, but I still think the K-01 is better.

**monochrome** · 01-13-2015, 10:10 AM

And for short pancakes with QuickShift.

yorik · 01-13-2015, 10:20 AM

Originally posted by monochrome

And for short pancakes with QuickShift.

Even without quickshift - the K-01 pairs very nicely with the FA 43.

GeneV · 01-14-2015, 06:49 AM

Originally posted by clackers

Big and with contrast detect AF only, but produces really good images from the ones people have posted around here.

I don't mind the size at all (smaller than an Sony with an adapter), but, sadly, the CD only AF makes it work well for stationary objects and manual focus.

LeRolls · 01-14-2015, 08:45 AM

Originally posted by yorik

Even without quickshift - the K-01 pairs very nicely with the FA 43.

Agreed. Used to be my go to combo. Still is on occasion.

winkler · 01-14-2015, 08:19 PM

Originally posted by Daedbird

...and let's not forget, I still feel the K-01 is the best Pentax for shooting video. Being able to use whatever mode you are in - and the settings - for shooting video is better than the K-3, which only uses a preset mode when you start shooting video. The K-3 is good for video, but I still think the K-01 is better.

I heartily concur. I've owned my K01 now for nearly two years. I'm continually impressed with the video quality it produces. In regard to its photo capabilities ... I rarely use my K7. I really like the square shape because any table top, fence rail, wall, lamp post, etc., is a stable base for long exposures.

**Pioneer** · 01-14-2015, 08:36 PM

I do fully agree. I use support to ensure my photographs are clear and sharp as often as I can. The K-01 makes that as easy as I have ever seen next to my old Brownie.

But I do have to agree with his conclusions. $50 still buys you a nice K1000 kit and provides a viewfinder that makes my K5 look very sad. As long as you can find film you will be able to take pictures with a K1000 and that sweet, little, M 50/2 lens.

01-12-2015, 08:04 PM	#1
johnmflores Pentaxian Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Somerville, NJ Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,295	Praise in Vanity Fair for the K-01 The article says 2015 but I suspect it's a least one or two years old. FWIW, I won both clunkers mentioned in this story LOL. Quote: Or take the Pentax K-01, another unloved virgin, released only this February. Designed by Marc Newson, whose signature logo adorns the camera, the K-01 was a mirrorless model with a sweet APS-C sensor and packaged as a kit with a terrific pancake lens. (Pentax lenses have never gotten the hey-nonny-nonny of Leica or Zeiss glass but Pentax makes some dazzlers.) If the V1 was underdesigned and specc'd, the K-O1 was overbaked: a weighty, bulky camera with no EVF, not even an attachable one, and whose dials and choice of colors suggested a Tonka Toy with a lens. Personally, I found the blocky retro design intriguing, in part because of its almost lovable clunky chunky dorkiness and rejection of Apple-era snob cred, but a heavy camera hangs hard on the neck and that was a lot of money to pony up for a camera that might be a one-off, a corporate experiment that didn't pay off. As is apparently the case. No K-02 has been announced and the price of the original has plunged into the lower $400 range. Which makes it attractive, considering that it takes the full range of Pentax K mount lenses and may be considered a collectible some day. I kind of want one, even though I can't justify it, but, really, what digital camera purchases can be justified? Price Drop Jaw Drop \| Vanity Fair

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
In praise of the Diacord	Nesster	Pentax Compact Cameras	7	03-08-2013 02:26 PM
Vanity Fair on the K-01	bikecoboss	Pentax K-01	14	12-13-2012 05:31 AM
With HDMI out & 3.5mm stereo mic in the K-01 is better than the K-30 for video	jogiba	Pentax K-01	2	05-22-2012 01:52 PM
Tiger Woods on cover of Feb. Vanity Fair	jogiba	General Talk	15	01-05-2010 02:38 PM
Levi Johnston's Vanity Fair article	deadwolfbones	General Talk	25	09-27-2009 01:56 PM

01-12-2015, 09:30 PM	#2
clackers Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Melbourne Photos: Albums Posts: 13,508	Big and with contrast detect AF only, but produces really good images from the ones people have posted around here.

01-12-2015, 10:28 PM	#3
yorik Pentaxian Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Scotts Valley, CA Photos: Gallery Posts: 985	Originally posted by johnmflores The article says 2015 but I suspect it's a least one or two years old. FWIW, I won both clunkers mentioned in this story LOL. The references to the recent release of the K-01 `this past February' and the `recently released' rx100 make it pretty clear that it is a digital reissue of a 2013 article. All the same, the advice is good - rushing out to buy the most recent release usually means spending an extra 10-15%, if not more. I bought the K-01 as a second K-mount body when the price dipped below $300. At that price, I can forgive its foibles and enjoy the excellent IQ.

01-13-2015, 10:03 AM	#4
Daedbird Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 156	...and let's not forget, I still feel the K-01 is the best Pentax for shooting video. Being able to use whatever mode you are in - and the settings - for shooting video is better than the K-3, which only uses a preset mode when you start shooting video. The K-3 is good for video, but I still think the K-01 is better.

01-13-2015, 10:10 AM	#5
monochrome Lens Hoarder Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: St. Louis, MO Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 25,343	And for short pancakes with QuickShift.

01-13-2015, 10:20 AM	#6
yorik Pentaxian Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Scotts Valley, CA Photos: Gallery Posts: 985	Originally posted by monochrome And for short pancakes with QuickShift. Even without quickshift - the K-01 pairs very nicely with the FA 43.

01-14-2015, 06:49 AM	#7
GeneV Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Albuquerque NM Photos: Albums Posts: 9,829	Originally posted by clackers Big and with contrast detect AF only, but produces really good images from the ones people have posted around here. I don't mind the size at all (smaller than an Sony with an adapter), but, sadly, the CD only AF makes it work well for stationary objects and manual focus.

01-14-2015, 08:45 AM	#8
LeRolls Pentaxian Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: PSL, FL Posts: 4,149	Originally posted by yorik Even without quickshift - the K-01 pairs very nicely with the FA 43. Agreed. Used to be my go to combo. Still is on occasion.

01-14-2015, 08:19 PM	#9
winkler New Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Colorado Posts: 19	Originally posted by Daedbird ...and let's not forget, I still feel the K-01 is the best Pentax for shooting video. Being able to use whatever mode you are in - and the settings - for shooting video is better than the K-3, which only uses a preset mode when you start shooting video. The K-3 is good for video, but I still think the K-01 is better. I heartily concur. I've owned my K01 now for nearly two years. I'm continually impressed with the video quality it produces. In regard to its photo capabilities ... I rarely use my K7. I really like the square shape because any table top, fence rail, wall, lamp post, etc., is a stable base for long exposures.

01-14-2015, 08:36 PM	#10
Pioneer Site Supporter Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Elko, Nevada Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 1,289	I do fully agree. I use support to ensure my photographs are clear and sharp as often as I can. The K-01 makes that as easy as I have ever seen next to my old Brownie. But I do have to agree with his conclusions. $50 still buys you a nice K1000 kit and provides a viewfinder that makes my K5 look very sad. As long as you can find film you will be able to take pictures with a K1000 and that sweet, little, M 50/2 lens.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search