Originally posted by graphicgr8s Fox started it? Give me a break. CNN PMSNBC and all the other liberally biased media has the key on that. And they've been around a lot longer than Fox. Fox just brought about the other side of the coin.
Deregulated corporate media asking "Are we the librul biased media?" with a chorus of right-wing pundits saying 'Yes!' for lots of years doesn't a 'liberal media establishment' make.
Adding Fox News to be unabashedly a propaganda arm of the GOP and Right in general, while harping on the Orwellian insistence it is 'Fair And Balanced' (and being caught in distortion after distortion, even making its own 'Tea Party Express' *astroturf political movement*) Well, that doesn't mean everything's really been a 'liberal biased media' just cause conservatives say so whenever the facts or analyses don't suit them, which is often.
The general brawl about identity politics that everything's become is how the GOP stays relevant despite bringing us to near-disaster and being out of new 'solutions.' They've been voting as a bloc, party first, since the Clinton administration, .and strife amid the populace suits them, because it divides the opposition and takes headlines more toward issues they like, and away from things that take attention and thought.
The process of this has been going on since the 80's, with the removal of the civic responsibilities of news networks to pay the rent on the public's airwaves by keeping us informed. Started with the mergers and the sensationalistic 'newsmagazines' and the news-having-to-make-a-profit.
I've gone into that before.
Not like we didn't try to warn you decades ago, ...and here it is.
Much of the adversarial tone has built up from these media organs redefining where the 'center' is, ....for a long time claiming moderate-leaning-conservative was 'liberal,' and now moderate-leaning conservative is 'The Left,' ....and what's been redefined as 'conservative' is actually more of a right-wing corporate-serving-state situation.
A lot of this showed in recent elections, when if you took away the buzzwords and talking-point phrasings and polled people on the issues, a lot of people who consider themselves fairly conservative actually supported the 'liberal' position.
Currently, we're facing a lot of disaffection on both sides: the half of the country that voted Democrat having been once again very disappointed that the Democrats didn't get up and fight once it was clear the GOP had no real interest in cooperating, but instead decided to rewite the rules and say, 'Now every single little thing down to a regulatory appointment has to be filibuster-proof.'
While the Dems pretty much have defaulted to more or less 'business as usual.'
Very frustrating.
I, for one, am not too optimistic over the near term. If the terrible results of the poor management we'd been under that we've already seen weren't enough, I don't know what is.
The country's averted the worst of the catastrophe, but we've been prevented from taking too much in the way of pro-active steps toward really fixing the problems. Everything's been watered down to perhaps-decent, but I-think-inadequate, measures, and with the Supreme Court ruling that says corporations can spend unlimited money on elections, I don't necessarily expect big improvement, at least not in places such as I am now.
Calls for civility are all very good, and I echo them. Of course, with the way the corporate media induces a really short memory in people, I don't necessarily expect much at this point.
Pretty sad, really. I can only hope that the people will actually call on the President to *lead* us, ...this is why I voted for him, but we really have to hold up our end. We're too big and still-relatively-prosperous a nation to be wallowing in the 'No, we can't' we keep hearing, as if what'd been the status quo was something that we can really go back to.