Originally posted by Rico GeneV the only problem with your scenario is those things have to exist in the country to begin with to be destroyed in the first place. I doubt Afghanistan had any of those things power plants water plants etc of any significance that it would have affected the general population as a whole to cause mass deaths.
Even in Iraq those services were basically non existent to the greater population other then Saddam Husseins immediate circles.
No were have I said either that civilians haven't died. Civilians inevitably die in such conflicts. Due mostly to the fact they are used as shields by a bunch of cowards. But to sit here and claim coalition troops are responsible for tens of thousands of civilian deaths is ludicrous.
What about the things the Coalition troops have provided for the civilians populations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Like better water and sewer treatment. Better availability to electricity. Healthcare services that parts of Afghanistan probably hadn't seen in 20 years. For every civilian killed by accident by Coalition troops there are tens of thousand of good deeds happening to hundreds of thousands if not millions of other civilians that go unreported on.
I don't see anyone thanking the troops for their efforts that the media never report on. In the eyes of some the only good soldier is a dead soldier who should just be forgotten.
Thanking the soldiers has nothing to do with whether the war is a good idea. Soldiers suffer and die in bad wars as well as good. Many of my friends left parts of their bodies in Vietnam. Their sacrifice is appreciated, but there was little accomplished by it in the long run.
It is real easy to get a rough idea of the effects of a war. How many were dying each month before and after the invasion? In Iraq, the difference under Hussein and after the invasion was huge, and by about a million people not to our benefit. It was not just his inner circle that benefitted from civilization.
Afghanistan is less developed than Iraq, but the war definitely means that food and supplies do not move through the countryside and that civilians will be killed by soldiers on both sides.
I'd suggest you read up on what, if any, real improvements we've made to their lives before you make assumptions. You can't build much infrastructure during a war. The main reason why there probably won't be as big a difference in the death rate in Afghanistan before and after invasion as compared to Iraq is that Afghanistan is constantly under invasion.