I'm my eyes Byron, but I'm sure others would choose Shakespeare etc.
I say Byron because of his overall cultural impact. He's influenced the arts and pop culture in so many directions beyond the scope of his original work that he's become a spiritual icon/influence of sorts. Shakespeare's poetry on the other hand takes a definite backseat to his plays though in his own way his influence as a playwright is as wide as Byron's, more so even.
Despite the fact that there are probably more copies of Shakespeare's Complete Works out there than Byron's people who probably couldn't quote a Shakespeare poem to save their lives can and do often quote Byron's "She Walks In Beauty."
Byron is still the "rock star" of poetry. Among others he influenced The Doors, the Beatles, and the Moody Blues, probably dozens of other poets and writers who came after him and even today interest in his life and works is so strong it almost eclipses that of the other poets of his day.
Shelly, his contemporary and his friend may get one new bio every 5-10 years, but seldom does a year or two go by where someone is not touting new theories on Byron, his life, sexuality, his work. Byronmania is not only alive and well nearly 200 years after the poet's death it's flourishing.
I feel truth is both relative when it comes to opinions and liking, and absolute when it comes to something that can be easily proven by science. No one can deny gravity exists and I think few would try, that's an absolute proof in our universe, but whether or not one religion has the answer versus another, that's a relative truth and can only be based upon the opinion and beliefs of the person being asked. Every religious group out there wants to think that they alone "know" God, but I have to challenge any religion that states their religion has all the answers.
To me it's just absurd for us humans to think that we can truly know the mind of a being or beings that created something as large as our universe. That's like asking a fly on the wall to "know" us as individual persons with all our likes and dislikes, something which is probably far beyond it's limited scope of comprehension.
A fly would only see our physicality as it pertains to it's life cycle, in terms of it's food needs, and our taking up part of it's space. It can't know our beliefs, our hopes, our humanity anymore than we can truly step down to it's level and understand what it is to be a simple little fly.
We're likely the flies in the universe of what ever created us. "God" is probably to us what we are to a fly. We'd like to think we "get" what created us, what it's like, what it's design is for this universe and us, but likely we can't really know. We're simply not at a level of being that even compares to that of whatever created us. But we feel the need for rules, an explanation, a label, a face for "God" so we give "God" one, as best as we can.
That's not absolute truth though. That's relative truth and it changes quite frequently over time as we grow and mature and learn that our old ideas in that direction simply aren't enough to describe the Ultimate Truth of what made us. If it wasn't so? We'd still be living as as we were 5000 years ago and we'd be drawing pictures of "Gods" with animal heads and such, not reaching upward and outward to a more faceless, dogma-less divinity with every new day.
There's a reason so many traditional religions are losing members rapidly. Many people are outgrowing "religion" as they know it. They still want the connection to the Divine, and a sense of spirituality, but they're also heartily sick of the rules and elitist attitudes of the major religions. They want something else and they're not nearly as afraid of leaving and going out to find it anymore. They want to find their "own" truth no matter what the religions of their birth might say and a lot of people just simply don't believe in absolute truth when it comes to religion anymore.
Originally posted by Blue Then who is the greatest poet of all time?