Originally posted by Parallax O'Donnell doesn't seem to quite understand what the Constitution says, or what the Founding Fathers' intent was when creating it. With that in mind, recent history would suggest that that makes her a prime candidate for the next open position on the Supreme Court.
Love it... on that note:
Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft: Justifying Innocent Arrests - Wendy Kaminer - National - The Atlantic Quote: Yesterday, at the request of the Obama Administration, and to the dismay of civil libertarians, the Supreme Court agreed to review a 9th Circuit decision denying former Attorney General John Ashcroft immunity in a lawsuit by Abdullah al-Kidd, who was detained as a material witness in 2003. I'm recycling here my comments on this case, published last year in Free Inquiry Magazine.
Adding another snake to the pile.. one who's fallen off the radar a bit......
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003753510&cpage=2 Quote: “Linda McMahon is calling in her corporate public relations machine to reinforce her $50 million political attack machine because the people of Connecticut are learning the truth about her profits-before-people record at the WWE,” Blumenthal’s campaign manager Mindy Myers said. “There is nothing that will hide or change that record of forcing her wrestlers to sign death clauses, canceling steroid testing to improve her bottom line, and paying lobbyists to get her out from under health and safety rules.”