Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-21-2010, 09:08 AM   #1
Inactive Account




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Orleans
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,053
Campaign Rules Of Engagement

The paper here has an editorial about the house race that has turned a bit dirtier than even standard elections with baseless and outrageous claims coming from both sides. The writer had a what I think is a pretty good accounting of standard low blows and dirty campaigning tricks:

QuoteQuote:
That's the genius of this devious strategy: You get to plant a seed and stir suspicions without allowing the other guy to confront his accuser, all while claiming your own hands are clean.

What's striking about this outbreak of unfairness is that it's not necessary, because there are plenty of ways to insinuate within the normal bounds of political campaigning.
Candidates can tag their opponents with a procedural vote, or a vote on a bill introduced just to force an embarrassing roll call.

Or they can zero in on a minor provision of a large bill. In the real world of governing, politicians know they have to support some things they don't want to get the things they do want, and vice versa. In the language of political campaigns, that up or down vote represents a candidate's record on every single letter and comma in the measure.

Office-seekers can use the misdeeds or unpopular politics of their opponents' staffers, supporters, and party leaders as ammunition. They can populate ads with scary voices, images, and words, and darken the overall tone to create a sinister mood.

And they can take a kernel of documented truth, or a credible allegation by an identifiable person, and exaggerate it beyond recognition. Happens all the time.

Still, the commonly accepted rules of engagement demand that there be a kernel, something voters can evaluate on their own to decide whether it's credible.
Richmond keeps up with Cao, smear for smear: Stephanie Grace | NOLA.com

What are your electioneering pet peeves?

I hate the push polls and the harassing robocalls.

At least when they hire a real person to make the phone calls you can mess with their script by asking, "why should I vote for Mr. X?" And follow it up with asking for a more specific question about their stance on the policy and when they say, "do you even live in this district or this country? Why should I listen to you for advice on who to vote for?"

10-27-2010, 11:05 AM   #2
Inactive Account




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Orleans
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,053
Original Poster
Heres a tip to get the robocallers off your back, I haven't had a chance to try it yet but I will at the next opportunity.

Press Pound to to Escape Political Robocall Lists
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
bill, engagement, opponents, person, rules, smear, vote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Street photography - rules of engagement? jpzk Photographic Technique 21 10-17-2010 12:42 AM
OMGZ Pentax has a fall ad campaign! Chwisch87 Pentax News and Rumors 7 10-08-2010 09:08 PM
Supreme Court strikes down campaign spending limits 5-4 deadwolfbones General Talk 24 01-23-2010 07:36 AM
Lost and Found...Chopard Campaign benjikan General Talk 1 11-20-2009 04:48 PM
New Pentax ad campaign NaClH2O Pentax DSLR Discussion 21 09-25-2008 05:37 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:36 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top