Originally posted by Ron Kruger Kx: Cheaper, smaller scopes simply don't gather light very well, nor are the optics very clear, and the wider field makes it harder to center the cross-hairs on small game. The larger you can make the target in the frame, and the clearer you can see it, the more accurate you will be. 6X is about right for a squirrel, for example, at 30-40 yards. Any closer you can crank it down to 3X. At 9X you can test your skills at 75-100 yards, which is nearly impossible with standard 4X "squirrel scopes." It's really the same thing as long range shooting with a .308, except on a shorter scale.
Whether you are at 3X or 9X, a good scope will be zeroed in, but you do have to compensate for bullet drop, even with high-volocity LR ammo. Run a box or two through at the range, zeroing in at 25-35 yards, then shoot at 50, 75 and 100 to gauge bullet drop. If you use good scope mounts and rings, it will stay zeroed in, unless you bump it hard. It's always a good idea, nonetheless, to check your zero point occasionally, and especially if you start missing.
You'll not only be much more accurate, you'll enjoy using your .22 much more if you put the time in at the range (a real range) and mount a big-game scope on it.
Thanks for the advice but I do not plan on shooting any small game with my .22 lr at all, just tin can and paper range and that is why I was considering the 1x red dot. The .308 would be for medium/somewhat big game such as deer or elk and that is why I was considering a 3-9x for my .308.
I actually found a 3-9x scope / 1x Red Dot combo from NCStar. I have read that company is decent for the $ ($160 for that combo) so I think I am going to give them a try. I also have 30 days to get a full refund if I do not like it.