Originally posted by Peter Zack redrock, I couldn't agree more in every respect. I feel the same as you and recently heard about this book:
Attachment 87500
Which I've ordered.
Well, I have read it and find Hitchens a fool because he seems incapable of distinguishing between God and religion. They are two completely different issues. Whatever folly the religious indulge in has absolutely nothing to do with the possibility of a conscious universe (which some have called "God"). Further, a great many in religion are more humble, loving, kind, and giving because of their participation. But my fool label for Hitchens is mostly because he thinks religion is what is "poisoning" everything. I would bet my life that if religion did not exist, and never had, human beings would be doing the exact same stupid, cruel, thoughtless, self-serving stuff they now do.
What happens is that when it comes time for a selfish human being to act as such, he looks around for some sort of justification. Religion, with the almighty God of the universe behind it, is a fantastic justification for self-serving jerk-ness. But Stalin didn't need religion did he? Nor Joseph Bonanno, or Mao, or Czar Nicholas, or Pasha, or Pol Pot, or Hirohito, or Kim Jong, or Kaiser Wilhelm, or King Leopold, or any of the numerous tyrants responsible for hundreds of millions of deaths over history. If we don't stop blaming the wrong things for our evil, we can never properly address it. Face it, it isn't religion or anything else that is behind evil . . . it is selfishly (versus enlightened) self-serving human beings.