Originally posted by dadipentak I smell a rat. First of all, he looks
very young in that clip: I'll bet it's not from the 2008 campaign. Second, given the crap that the right has been putting out (Swiftboat, Acorn, NPR) I strongly suspect it's been edited.
Doesn't even *have* to be for what Jim's trying to pull here, but, yeah, there's jumps. Certainly not much context to speak of, but still enough to actually know a sensible person seeing that in person would get it. Excuses to willfully *not* get it, (Especially *given* the context: if one values service veterans so much, why attack Obama *for saying it is expected by veterans that they be treated well, according to how a veteran's WWII father expects as an implied *pact?* )
Where's the complaint, there? That Obama disrespects veterans by saying their fathers led them to expect *better?*
Are they that *blind?*
Especially considering those who actually *do* wave bloody shirts, and *cut* benefits while what... Vilifying liberals.
Which is where, if we *really* have to even *take* this that seriously, is where this attempt at a 'gotcha' *really* falls down. If he was intending to *deceive* people into what, not hating Obama, as opposed to just speaking as I said, or referring to his grandfather, *why?* To what end?
Everyone knows his family history, it was an attack point of his opposition... Everyone *knows* that while he was *not* running as a hawk, he was *advocating better treatment of vets than the militarists did.* Everyone *knows* *nothing leaned on any such claim if it were as accused anyway, so *why?*
What's 'evil Obama' up to, here? Some nasty conspiracy to get elected and ...not cut veterans' benefits? Hrm.