Originally posted by TaoMaas "Art-speak"...I love it! That's exactly what I call this kind of gibberish. When your statement is better than your
art, you've got a problem.
And the art world is very problematic, has been ever since
modernismo. It may take another century or so to shake out of it. Ah well, writing is easier than doing.
I read an intriguing analysis about visual arts vs music in the past century. Classical music mostly rejected modernism, and is now sequestered in subsidized cloisters. Pop music has no connexion, and thrives. Opposite, the visual art (painting-print-sculpture-etc) establishment tried to stay aloof, then happily found that modern and post-modern stuff sells, and now dominates both 'serious' and pop markets without corporate-govt-church subsidies. And literature seems to follow the musical model: serious work languishes in subsidized academic ghettos and pop trash sells gazillions.
Gobbledygook can be written about the products and processes of either model, but the 'serious' forms seem to generate more. Maybe buyers expect more for their money than just straightforward presentation. Maybe the SUBSIDIZERS expect their money to buy 'sophisticated' explanations. This language is taught, y'know. I just pulled out an old textbook, WRITING THEMES ABOUT LITERATURE which includes cinema analysis. Much there could be directly paraphrased to write artist statements. "What is the theme of my life? Explain it." Toss in some PoMo jargon and it's a sure grant-winner.