Originally posted by eddie1960 REality is the Christian Extremists are a very very vocal small minority that make the rest look bad. Biggest problem is the moderates don't seem to be stepping up and holding them to account thus inferring approval of their actions. I'm as far from religious as it gets but this is the way it looks to me.
I'm with you these people scare me more than any Islamist jihaddist does. and both just remind me of the middle ages crusaders.
well I certainly understand that they are a minority in terms of the 70+ percent of americans who call themselves christians? but it isn't just the extreme extremists like these that I think are a threat, its just as you say, the moderates that allow this to happen in their name that are a big part of the problem. but in terms of my 'majority' bit about getting into heaven, I realize its a bit off topic, but I am convinced through my own experience that most people who call themselves christians are truthfully anything but, and if they believe that being christian is the only true way to meet your 'saviour', then most won't be meeting him. this extends well beyond the reach of extremists and encompasses what I believe is a complete lack of what are supposed to be proper christian values and beliefs according to the teachings of christ and the bible. but thats something for another discussion really, I just thought id explain a little better what I was saying.
Originally posted by MRRiley I agree completely! The only reason I am sort of defending Lowes is that they are in some ways the victim in this situation. FFA is the real bad guy here and it would be much more effective going after them than going after Lowes or any of the other companies who caved to their insidious influence.
I would never claim lowe's to be a victim in any way, especially when they have every right to make the decision they so chose. they weren't forced by any law to succumb to the threats of anyone. they pushed morals and ethics aside to protect money. being legal to do so, doesn't make it the right thing to do, so saying they are a victim in any way is just wrong to me. I agree though that we should be going after the FFA, I agree completely as it would be far more effective, however you have to take into account that attacking a big company like lowe's will bring national attention to something in a way that attacking the FFA directly may not, and lets face it, taking on corporate greed or complete lack of ethics (you know since they are people too) in any way at the same time is in my eyes a good thing. I'm all for doing away with extremists like the FFA, but I boycott lowe's as a personal protest as far as my own morals and ethics are concerned and I think thats why a lot of people are doing the same thing.
Last edited by séamuis; 12-14-2011 at 11:05 AM.