Originally posted by MRRiley "More balanced" because it makes it all look like the kid's fault Gene? I don't think so. Of course we will probably never know the whole truth, because you can't really expect a child that young to remember exactly what any unrelated adult told them to do, especially when its a scary inspector-type adult. And the school system and the Dept of Health are clearly circling the wagons and will never admit it if the inspector really did make the school give her a new lunch. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle, but regardless of that, the school system has no right making dietary decisions for any child unless there is clear and persistent evidence of neglect or malnourishment.
Mike
More balanced because it is not trying to over blow this into some national issue. Once this became part of the Limbaugh dogma, finding a straight source became difficult.
Four year old children often don't get it right. That is why they can't be witnesses. Children often find unknown adults scary, whether they are "inspectors" or not. We really don't know that the school made any dietary decision for any child. A suggestion to a 4 year old may easily be distorted into a decision.
I don't know about this particular child, but children of a single working parents who are barely holding it together (or two frazzled parents) with limited resources are often sent to school hungry and poorly cared for. Teachers and schools are held accountable when these children can't learn. Schools have been forced to do a lot of things which parents should be doing, and feeding them is just one of those things. It is sad, but I'm not sure what the alternative would be.
Last edited by GeneV; 02-22-2012 at 05:46 AM.