Originally posted by GeneV The other rather uninformed point made in a previous post was that Iran would like to see Israeli territory in "Arab" hands. Perhaps they would favor this if it were Shiite Arabs. I constantly hear people equate "Muslim" with "Arab." Iran's most costly war in modern history was with an Arab country backed by most of the Arab world.
Oh here we go....
Persians originate from an Indoeuropean tribe, hence the persian language is closer to english (and effectively all other indo-european languages) than to arabic, despite the fact that they use same (or at least similar) alphabet (or letters).
On the other hand both Jews and Arabs originate from semitic tribes leading to some similarities between languages as well.
Been an Arab has at least in theory nothing to do with being a muslim as there are many muslims which are not Arabs (Iran, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malasya, Turkey...) and there are even some christan Arabs (in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan...). On the other hand more than 90% of Arabs are muslim, and more than 90% muslims living in Israel ara Arabs.
As someone mentioned earlier regarding the religios positions of state of Israel (in radical christian and jewish groups), you still have radical positions in muslim world about the right to existence of a jewish state on a "holy" land. Note also that even muslims regard Jerusalem as a holy city.
The war between Iraq and Iran was not a religous war since Saddam Husein was never interrested in religion. He considered himself more as a descendant of ancient babylon rulers. The war between Iran and Iraq was supported more by western powers (on Iraqi side) than by Iraqs arab neighbours.
So to conclude, Iran wants to see the Israel in muslim hands, thus beeing arab or palestine hands. That since the clashes between suni and shiite muslims are still much smaller than clashes between islam and judaism.