Originally posted by seacapt Again , irrelevant and by no means conclusive. I have on many occasions for demonstration purposes punched through boards or cinder blocks , sheared the neck off of Hienekin bottles and cracked coconuts with my bare hands leaving no marks or abbrasions. My 16 y/o can punch through a cinderblock without skinning his knuckles too. All the abbrasions mean is that he most probably was involved in a physical altercation.
I've seen those party tricks too. They are very impressive when done under rigidly controlled circumstances. I've also seen those party tricks go wrong when the person doesn't quite have the degree of concentration that they thought they had and miss by a little bit.
When that happens, it's broken bone time.
Now, if you are going to try to get me to believe that the conditions that are in place during a street fight are similar to those that are ensured during a karate demonstration, I will assure you, that dog don't hunt.
There is a big difference between being able to take your time, psych yourself up and hit something in exactly the right spot and being in a street fight where you are trying to hit a constantly moving target that is also trying to hit back.
Sorry Joe, while I applaud your ability to do fun little party tricks, they aren't really relevant to this discussion.
Originally posted by joe.penn @Blue - whatever is said and posted to this thread by you me and a couple others is wrong because our resident expert in everything there is to know about everything will continue and post the most ridiculous fallacious crap to attempt and sway perception that is more in line with his views:
Funny, I thought the autopsy report on Mr. Martin wasn't fallacious. Where did I go wrong?
I see you have been reduced to attacks on the person. Does this mean you will go away now and let the adults discuss things?
Quote: Really? You are just sooooooooo out of touch with reality - so I guess the police officer who took Zimmerman in the night of the incident (not long after the shooting) just happened to look at the back of Zimmermans head because he knew that they were going to have to create evidence, so it was planned when they got out of the car for him to look at the back of his head to get that on closed circuit camera. Is that correct? And, that's your final answer?
We've all seen where the police very quickly covers things up to protect one of their own. All it would take is for the police to decide that Zimmerman (who apparently wanted to be a cop) was close enough to being one of them for them to cover up for him.
It isn't much of a stretch, given the many other reports we've had surface lately of police malfeasance and the later discovery of a cover up.