Originally posted by jsherman999 FWIW I've always referred to the Democratic party as 'they' also, even though that's how I vote, but when I'm talking to other supporters of my chosen candidate, I use 'we'.
Institutional vs. Communal solidarity, maybe.
Yeah, that's a problem for the Dems, too. But, I consider myself a Green, not that there's much of a party involved there.
As for the mandate to buy corporate insurance, that's actually part of what the GOP really put in, given that there was no public option from the get-go and the insurance companies and all demanded privatized profits be a sacred cow from the get-go: in a sense that's what *they* get out of what concessions they have to make, like spending at least 80 percent on actual health care delivery (Still seems that leaves a lot of advertising and other stuff to be paying into,) ...but they also get a certain segment of lower-risk captive customers: any Constitutional issues about being forced to buy private products are a result of *that,* not what Obama's plan entailed. It's also why, as much of this reform as is actually very good, needed, and actually more popular than the branding 'Obamacare' makes people think, it's just not the long term solution for public health and job-suppressing health insurance costs that it could have been.
Talking points and distortions aside, this ain't actually about Obama's plan as presented, it's what made it through the filibusters and corporate demands, and about how that time and money was used to make the media perception of what this is different from what it actually ever ways: ie, manufacturing nonconsent.
How that'll play out in the corporate media electioneering horse-race-for-ratings-profits, well, that's anyone's guess. But the GOP will be trying to use it for the richest and most fanatical Right they can as always, truth of the matter or interests of the people be damned.