Originally posted by Unsinkable II I actually own and have seen that movie at least 4 dozen times since I was a kid. Both the book and the movie are wonderful I think. But that still didn't take away from the amazement of seeing Billie Jean done live for the first time. Sorry we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. I do not think you're giving MJ his due.
I love Fosse. I will avidly watch anything he's done, but I don't think it takes anything away from MJ's own dancing that he obviously learned from him. Every great dancer on the planet does that, borrows moves from other dancers. It's always been a big part of dancing. We wouldn't have most of the major classic forms of dancing unless that had happened actually. I studied dance for a lot of years actually. Everyone owes a debt to Fosse like they owe a debt to Balanchine or Astaire, et all. But no one in the dance world would consider what MJ did stealing. It's just a style of dancing, and Fosse actively taught it to many people who also passed it on until it just pretty much became a part of dance as a whole. But a lot of what you'd consider "his" moves he got from people before him too.
Jazz dance was around before Fosse. He just took those basic steps and made them his. What Fosse was most known for was his stylized use of his hands. But he wasn't the first one to use those. Those hands, they already existed in mime. He just brought them into dance and made them move. FYI, most classically trained dancers are also taught mime. I think Jackson actually was watching a lot of people besides Fosse. He was also a big Chaplin fan and if you look at how he moves sometimes, there's Chaplin in there too, and Disney animation, and Astaire, and a number of other influences. I don't think it was a conscious thing really and intentional act of stealing. I think he just grew up watching all these great dancers, all these different styles, as we all did, and got all this stuff deep into his subconscious. But even Fosse likely wouldn't have seen that as stealing. He would have seen himself as influencing MJ sure, but if he was so jealous of his moves he wouldn't have taught so many people.
Dancers they aren't like that. They don't call each other out so much over things like this. They all learn from each other and pass it on. Nobody cares so much who the move "belongs" to. It's not like a song lyric situation where it's all copyrighted. Very few dancers, particularly those who consider themselves "hoofers" as both Fosse and MJ were want to do will go there, criticize another dancer for taking a move and making it his or her own. Dance is an art where one move comes out of another, one style evolves from another. People pass moves back and forth all the time. It's just how you learn, grow. FYI, Jackson was very good about teaching others "his" moves. He spent a lot of time creating some really great dancers out of his people and when someone copied him, like the kid who ended up in the Pepsi commercial, and the one who he practically adopted as a son later, he encouraged it. He had no major problem with anyone copying him. To be fair, he was copied probably as much if not more as he copied in his day, still is. How many videos do you see even now where people are dancing like MJ? Tons. Street Dance owes a lot to his moves and his popularizing it actually. MJ and others who came after him? They made it respectable to dance like that. Look at how the pop shows are done today vs when he started with his own shows. Find a few 70's pop videos. All you'll mostly see is people standing around playing instruments or barely moving. Not now. Every video is like a mini Broadway show. It's a whole different world and yes, a lot of that is MJ's doing....