Originally posted by Rico How much money do you get paid to frequent websites to post such ridiculous statements that Obama is a moderate democrat?
Really...you want to go there? I assure you I get paid no money for having a realistic political opinion.
All presidents have their closet monsters. I agree that Operation Fast & Furious constituted
very poor judgement. The goal of the operation was noble (to track guns to the source of the crime), but it was still a terrible idea in general and terribly executed. I would like to know what personal involvement Obama had in this one.
As for Solyndra; democrats generally favor giving government help to companies that promise green energy (particularly those who have novel ideas). Obviously some will succeed and some will fail (hopefully most will succeed). Whether you agree or disagree with with providing private companies with government assistance, it is normal democrat policy.
As for the kill list, it actually makes sense to me. Each operation caries not only military risk, but political risk, foreign relations risk, and has the potential to increase the recruitment of terrorists. I think Obama realizes that he owns the effects of these decisions, and thus want to have the final word (I say final word, because it seems as if those on the list would already be military targets if Obama was not micromanaging). I am personally against the war, so a bit unhappy about the kill list, but it makes sense to me.
My big point is that all presidents have their closet monsters. I think it goes with the level of power and responsibility they are given (i.e. special interests have a loud and compelling voice, and the president cannot micromanage everything). Clinton had them, Bush had them, I am sure Reagen had them, and Obama has them. Are Obama's any worse than the others? I don't think they are (or at least not significantly worse). I don't think Obama is the best president ever, and I don't think he is the worse president ever. Would Romney do better if elected? Perhaps or perhaps not (I don't really know). However, I do know that Romney would eventually develop his own list of closet monsters.
So, unless the presidents that came before him are also "utter incompetent frauds and serial liars," I do not believe he deserves that title. I also do not believe he deserves the title of "neo-marxist ideologue," as he has not governed using Marxist policies. Obama is a moderate democrat; nothing less, and nothing more.