Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 1 Like Search this Thread
07-30-2012, 02:40 PM   #1
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jpzk's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Québec
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,251
Apple is going after Samsung again.

So now that I 've just bought a Samsung Galaxy smart phone, Apple is going after Samsung, again.
I guess they're (Apple) not too happy with Samsung having sold double the numbers over the past few months.

Apple, Samsung face off in federal court over patents - The Globe and Mail

Apple, Samsung face off in court over iPhone, iPad | Fox News

and this one from the Android community:
Samsung Legal Filing Reveals Different Picture than Apple Claims; Apple Stole Ideas

JP

07-30-2012, 02:59 PM   #2
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
grhazelton's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jonesboro, GA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,972
I've heard via NPR that Apple asserts that the rectangular shape, with rounded corners and edges, is a patent protected feature of the iPad, and the fact that the Samsung sports a similar shape is thus an infringement. Well, let's see. The Asahi Pentax had a pentaprism housing which closely followed the prism it covered. The Canonflex and Nikon F had similar pentaprism housings and were introduced well after the Pentax. Does Pentax have an actionable claim against Nikon and Canon?

Is it not possible that products fuffilling similar purposes will have a certain similarity, even if made by competitors? And that these similarities are not the result of intellectual theft, but rather of good old "form follows function"? Would Trek bicycle sue Cannondale over the two wheel issue?
07-30-2012, 03:02 PM - 1 Like   #3
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Syracuse, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,477
QuoteOriginally posted by grhazelton Quote
I've heard via NPR that Apple asserts that the rectangular shape, with rounded corners and edges, is a patent protected feature of the iPad, and the fact that the Samsung sports a similar shape is thus an infringement. Well, let's see. The Asahi Pentax had a pentaprism housing which closely followed the prism it covered. The Canonflex and Nikon F had similar pentaprism housings and were introduced well after the Pentax. Does Pentax have an actionable claim against Nikon and Canon?

Is it not possible that products fuffilling similar purposes will have a certain similarity, even if made by competitors? And that these similarities are not the result of intellectual theft, but rather of good old "form follows function"? Would Trek bicycle sue Cannondale over the two wheel issue?
''

Besides...

1949 -> 1955 -> 1957

Last edited by boriscleto; 07-30-2012 at 04:02 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
apple, court, samsung

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Misc Apple Grand Moff Tarkin Post Your Photos! 6 06-29-2012 02:07 PM
Size of Samsung NX-10 compared to Pentax K20D, Samsung GX-20 Clone Samsungian Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 11 01-21-2010 12:26 PM
Samsung's mobile phone business to absorb Samsung Digital Imaging? Tommy Pentax News and Rumors 2 09-30-2009 08:46 AM
Samsung Techwin's camera biz is now Samsung Digital Imaging and its NX plans. samsung Pentax News and Rumors 3 03-13-2009 08:42 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top