Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Closed Thread
Show Printable Version 11 Likes Search this Thread
08-29-2012, 10:58 AM   #91
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2011
Location: Southern California
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,082
QuoteOriginally posted by jeffkrol Quote
OF course there is that "economic stimulus" behind feeding the war machine..and hiring people......
Give that money to NASA and Research Universities, the benefits to mankind would be incalculable.

08-29-2012, 11:34 AM   #92
Veteran Member
GeneV's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Albuquerque NM
Photos: Albums
Posts: 9,830
QuoteOriginally posted by jeffkrol Quote
The MOST inefficient organization ($ wise) in the world is probably the US military but most could care less and their "trust fund" is constantly replenished.............

OF course there is that "economic stimulus" behind feeding the war machine..and hiring people......
And, to a great extent, government exists to perform functions which "efficient" private, profit-making enterprises won't do. It may be more "efficient" for a society just to let all the poor, inefficient population die. We've had several experiments with extremely "efficient" forms of government. It didn't work out that well.

And, as far as efficiency goes, being first in expenditure by a wide margin and 37th in results is not a definition of efficiency. Whatever anecdotes one can find of what happened to cousin George in what country, the differences in results even for things that we do well, such as cancer outcomes, is relatively small compared to the doubling in amounts spent per capita. The double spent per capital is especially ridiculous when one considers the number of capita which are not paying or covered at all.

Whatever nasty stories one comes up with about the UK, people live longer there than in the U.S. and fewer babies die. The list goes on from there.

Last edited by GeneV; 08-29-2012 at 12:00 PM.
08-30-2012, 12:54 PM   #93
Inactive Account




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Orleans
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,053
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by jeffkrol Quote
The MOST inefficient organization ($ wise) in the world is probably the US military but most could care less and their "trust fund" is constantly replenished.............

OF course there is that "economic stimulus" behind feeding the war machine..and hiring people......
Not to defend wasteful spending on our overbuilt military, but they do have to operate in very harsh conditions, operate in a redundant matter, and often make decisions with regard to human life which they rightly make without concern for cost. All of these things add up to them being extremely inefficient on a cost basis but effective at executing their mission.

Other public institutions could focus on costs like the library that I drove by last night which was the only place for blocks with lights because they have a generator which kicks on automatically but was still closed due to the storm. Why does a library need this type of system which probably added tens of thousands of dollars to their construction cost?
08-30-2012, 12:57 PM   #94
Veteran Member
jeffkrol's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wisconsin USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 8,434
QuoteOriginally posted by mikemike Quote
Not to defend wasteful spending on our overbuilt military, but they do have to operate in very harsh conditions, operate in a redundant matter, and often make decisions with regard to human life which they rightly make without concern for cost. All of these things add up to them being extremely inefficient on a cost basis but effective at executing their mission.

Other public institutions could focus on costs like the library that I drove by last night which was the only place for blocks with lights because they have a generator which kicks on automatically but was still closed due to the storm. Why does a library need this type of system which probably added tens of thousands of dollars to their construction cost?
I believe Bush got criticized for substandard flak jackets..........

08-30-2012, 01:21 PM   #95
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
grhazelton's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jonesboro, GA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,972
QuoteOriginally posted by mikemike Quote
Not to defend wasteful spending on our overbuilt military, but they do have to operate in very harsh conditions, operate in a redundant matter, and often make decisions with regard to human life which they rightly make without concern for cost. All of these things add up to them being extremely inefficient on a cost basis but effective at executing their mission.

Other public institutions could focus on costs like the library that I drove by last night which was the only place for blocks with lights because they have a generator which kicks on automatically but was still closed due to the storm. Why does a library need this type of system which probably added tens of thousands of dollars to their construction cost?
Maybe for sump pumps?

Even small libraries will have hundreds of thousands invested of dollars in books and other media alone, in addition to computers, etc. As a retired librarian I can attest that a brief power failure can "crash" automated catalog/circulation systems and public access computer terminals, costing much staff time and patron frustration to bring things back up.

On the broader issue of cost cutting re: libraries. With the federal tax on inventories most publishers are unwilling to carry items on their books beyond the initial surge of interest. Printings tend to be smaller. If scarcity of funds prohibits purchase of worthy items they may never be available again. Continuity in a library's collection development, especially in non-fiction, is important, and being unable to buy an item today may mean that it will be virtually unobtainable in the future.

Historically libraries and librarians have been experts in making a dollar out of 98 cents, but there are limits. As in education, the effects of short-sighted funding cuts may not be immediately obvious, but they will show up in the future. We shouldn't eat our seed corn.
08-31-2012, 03:44 AM   #96
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 426
QuoteOriginally posted by kenafein Quote
Give that money to NASA and Research Universities, the benefits to mankind would be incalculable.
I would be all for that. Better to have science and technology than bombs in my opinion.
08-31-2012, 04:06 AM - 1 Like   #97
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,451
NO reform is at all possible until Republican control of the house and Senate are eliminated. The Executive is only one branch of the government. It is just pure mis-information to blame the current economic woes on Obama when every piece of legislation he proposes is gutted by the Republicans. There will be no progress in the US until Republicans are reduced to a minority, possibly even replaced by a more responsible party with conservative values. There is simply stated no bottom to Republican debauchery. They will go as low as they have to go to win. There is amount of lying or deceit that they won't sink to in an effort to control the American people for the benefit of the rich. Lying is permissible, slander is permissible, making up facts is permissible. Blaming others for things they have done is permissible.

If you think they have hit rock bottom yet you are wrong. In the coming elections, you are about to witness the lowest campaign ever run. It will leave Americans wondering about the viability of democracy, and Americans will face the unrestrained assault of deceit, misrepresentation and distortion of the facts. It will be justified by those who are so bigoted they believe anything they do or say against Obama is fair game because the end justifies the means. I see them posting on this forum already. You know who you are.

08-31-2012, 05:36 AM   #98
Banned




Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Charleston & Pittsburgh
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,668
QuoteOriginally posted by mikemike Quote
these things add up to them being extremely inefficient on a cost basis but effective at executing their mission
So lets see. The united states has items like the; one billion dollar per copy Seawolf class subs, B2 stealth bombers costing how much per copy, and also F35 jet fighters that are highly unreliable. Yet take all three of those combines or by themselves... How much could one country use hardware such as this against enemies in Iraq and Afganistan.

Yet troops not getting proper care while on duty or after duty at places such as the veterans administration.

Nothing quite like a country that has about fifty percent of it's budget going towards the military; and for what?
08-31-2012, 10:03 AM   #99
Inactive Account




Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: New Orleans
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,053
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by grhazelton Quote
Maybe for sump pumps?

Even small libraries will have hundreds of thousands invested of dollars in books and other media alone, in addition to computers, etc. As a retired librarian I can attest that a brief power failure can "crash" automated catalog/circulation systems and public access computer terminals, costing much staff time and patron frustration to bring things back up.

On the broader issue of cost cutting re: libraries. With the federal tax on inventories most publishers are unwilling to carry items on their books beyond the initial surge of interest. Printings tend to be smaller. If scarcity of funds prohibits purchase of worthy items they may never be available again. Continuity in a library's collection development, especially in non-fiction, is important, and being unable to buy an item today may mean that it will be virtually unobtainable in the future.

Historically libraries and librarians have been experts in making a dollar out of 98 cents, but there are limits. As in education, the effects of short-sighted funding cuts may not be immediately obvious, but they will show up in the future. We shouldn't eat our seed corn.
I am not trying to diminish the importance of libraries, but that generator seems like a "nice-to-have" that was used to eat up their full construction budget but which might have been better returned to state/local/FEMA if only to install that generator somewhere more important in an emergency like the fire station across the street from it which was dark. And the damn library isn't even open until Monday even though it would be nice if they would open their doors to their neighbors without power.
08-31-2012, 12:17 PM   #100
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 12,350
QuoteOriginally posted by kenafein Quote
Sigh, called my Grandmother last night and she said "I'm listening to Ann Romney, let me turn it down."
I make it a practice of listening to ALL candidates. I don't make a decision until I've heard what all of them have to say. Maybe that's waht your Grandma does.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
class, income, middle, percent, president, recession, recovery, study

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Top Obama advisor endorses Romney for President Jack General Talk 1 04-16-2012 05:50 PM
John McCain Endorses Mitt Romney (Mistakenly President Obama) For 2012 jogiba General Talk 2 01-06-2012 04:44 PM
Is AIV really any worse than MIJ? DanielT74 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 52 10-02-2011 12:09 AM
People Worse Than Otis..... Rupert Post Your Photos! 7 08-30-2011 06:31 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top