Originally posted by mikemike Not to defend wasteful spending on our overbuilt military, but they do have to operate in very harsh conditions, operate in a redundant matter, and often make decisions with regard to human life which they rightly make without concern for cost. All of these things add up to them being extremely inefficient on a cost basis but effective at executing their mission.
Other public institutions could focus on costs like the library that I drove by last night which was the only place for blocks with lights because they have a generator which kicks on automatically but was still closed due to the storm. Why does a library need this type of system which probably added tens of thousands of dollars to their construction cost?
Maybe for sump pumps?
Even small libraries will have hundreds of thousands invested of dollars in books and other media alone, in addition to computers, etc. As a retired librarian I can attest that a brief power failure can "crash" automated catalog/circulation systems and public access computer terminals, costing much staff time and patron frustration to bring things back up.
On the broader issue of cost cutting re: libraries. With the federal tax on inventories most publishers are unwilling to carry items on their books beyond the initial surge of interest. Printings tend to be smaller. If scarcity of funds prohibits purchase of worthy items they may never be available again. Continuity in a library's collection development, especially in non-fiction, is important, and being unable to buy an item today may mean that it will be virtually unobtainable in the future.
Historically libraries and librarians have been experts in making a dollar out of 98 cents, but there are limits. As in education, the effects of short-sighted funding cuts may not be immediately obvious, but they will show up in the future. We shouldn't eat our seed corn.