Originally posted by ihasa As an aside, Obama does apparently have 'slave blood' - from his mother's side of the family via Toots.
That's a lesson in racism all to its own. there's been the idea that Obama can't have Irish ancestry cause he's 'black' or not even considering that, yes a whole lot of 'white' people *do* have 'slave ancestors,' ...if you care about ancestors. (And there's OK ways to care about ancestors, don't get me wrong: I actually looked it up when it came up, and our President is actually a kinsman of mine way back, that way. )
But when people start trying to draw these dividing lines around 'race,' they forget that it's not always tidy, like that. Especially if they can only see divisions. Or in the cons' case, that's the only thing they're looking for. (Since when did Rush think being 'Black enough' was a plus? Gods.)
Occasionally, someone comes along making too much of 'ancestral ties' and forgets that just cause *I'm* so darn white solar radiation hits my bones, seemingly... that... Actually probably there's going on millions of 'black people' in this nation with more Nordic blood than I carry. It's even possible for black people to have more *Gaelic* blood than I carry. And past a point, you're going to find people that ain't 'pure' by those standards, either.
And things like, even the *claim* that 'Our President doesn't know what it's like to be black cause he doesn't have any 'Slave blood' ...' I mean, does anyone think when he or I were growing up anyone was asking that question and making that distinction? What would *that* change?
One thing that *doesn't* change is they're still trying to make him an 'evil other' for having ancestors from Africa... For being 'African-American...'
But still trying to drive some wedge over.... yeah, the idea 'Oh, he's 'really' Muslim.'
And of course, the idea that 'He's not really black, either, cause his mother was 'white' therefore... Ooops.
So what was their point?