Originally posted by gokenin
Gene the line that is bold is the statement that I was trying to understand, the impression is that you say she can claim to be a Native American then change her mind and both are correct? I understand that you say that not everyone has a complete genealogical profile of their families however when you fill out applications you are stating that what you are putting in them is the truth and not the truth at the time so that it serves your purpose. I feel that if you are claiming minority status you had better be able to prove it if you can't then you are belittling the people that can honestly claim that status.
As I said in the lengthy post above: at the time in question, there really *was* a great deal of shifting discussion about what Native American ancestry *meant.* (Actually, some of the controversy about casinos in various states about tribal status is really some of the downstream fallout from this: it's a complicated issue.)
Simply put, though, at the time, people could be being perfectly honest and fill out a different blank than consensus might call for now.