Originally posted by Winder Technically that is a sauwastika on his chest and not a swastika. The only known difference being a sauwastika is left facing and a swastika is right facing. It probably has an alternate meaning as they are both listed as separate symbols in ancient writing.
Meaning-wise, it matters somewhat less, the direction, in various cultures, than popular culture makes of it today: people want to say 'Well, it facing one way is 'good' and the other way is 'bad' but in a lot of instances, but the direction it's drawn in often doesn't much matter: I suspect in some others, it denotes which way one's looking at it, like it were a physical object. Don't know about Bon usage in particular, but it's been a sacred symbol throughout much of the ancient world.
Quote: I wish they had a better picture. I would like to know what is in the left hand. This would have been a super premium piece for its day and everything carved into it would have had a meaning.
We have the Aureola so we know the person depicted is sacred.
His right had is turned out and lowered which for a Buddha image would be an offering of compassion, but they say this is "pre-Buddha".
The swastika meaning greater or higher self (assuming swastika & sauwastika to have the same meaning).
Bon religion shares a lot of coherence with Buddhism, despite being even older: some might even say an earlier Buddha turned up there: the cultural similarities with the Buddhism of the Himalayas in particular is pretty obvious: since a lot of those regions were on trade routes, it's not surprising there are some shared practices and imagery.
The Nazi interest in these things and the symbol had a great deal to do with certain anthropological theories about the 'Aryans' (Which they determined had to be Nordic people without much basis: it was certainly known that swastikas were all over the ancient world, so it fit in pretty nicely with their attempts to claim ancient legitimacy for their racialist theories: a lot of this comes from Blavatsky's attempts to tie a bunch of things together according to certain takes on certain anthropological theories: a lot of what you hear about as 'Nazi occultism' rather telephone-tagged from there through certain elements in Theosophy (Actually, you can read about the debates of the time in those circles, if you happen to have come across certain editions of certain works published by the Theosophical society: people don't like to admit it, but there was plenty of popular racism and anti-Semitism and crackpot eugenic ideas out in the world in the Twenties and Thirties, including in America: some of what was going on in Theosophical inquiry much-mirrored the times: (The Theosophical Society was really in large measure structured around discussing *any* ideas, interestingly, some of those notions filtered down into some of what those nice white-lighty crystal-wavin' New Agers (yes, there's a big difference between New Age and Pagan, though some will tell you differently, btw.) read and talk about
: Atlantis and 'ascended masters' and the like.) Certain people kind of got into positions of relative influence as teachers with some of those very ideas, though: I suspect this division has a great deal to do with the emphasis on unfailing positivity in that set since WWII: where people could end up taking certain theories became clear enough to those actually seeking some spirituality, obviously.
In the case of 'Nazi occultism,' much of this ended up almost purely racialist and generally rather nonsensical, and all about trying to prove something about a Teutonic 'master race:' certainly in the case of sticking a few runes on things, it bore little to no resemblance from even the 'nordic' Pagan cultures they were appropriating: (And lots of Christianity: the Nazis did run on a 'Christian values' platform, then started trying to supplant that authority, you see: that includes a long-standing undercurrent of anti-Semitism and the like that was already there, as well as certain 'secret societies' for the elite: there was more of Wagner than Wodin about *that,* though: particularly in Germany, but in many places, there was a big identity crisis about just who European people *were* or *are,* )
Anyway, in *that* context, the whole thing about swastikas and which way they're facing and the like had much to do with the Nazis going all around the world looking for 'evidence' of their 'Aryan master race' theory, but it was already known that that symbol would be found all over the place: the theories of 'Aryan invasions' especially on the Indian subcontinent were sort of put together by a cigar-smoking mystic lady (Who, ironically, was at least part-Jewish by upbringing,) decades before, though. It was easy enough to go from descriptions of people who were light*er*-skinned than the population now mostly found in southern India to notions of 'white people,' given the descriptions of the time. (You can probably imagine the Nazis would have been all over this statue here, with the right captioning, if they'd gotten hold of it, and never mind which way the symbol's facing.: what they sure *didn't* do is seem to talk much about the same symbols appearing with Goddesses all over the Mediterranean and Asia Minor and India: fascism sure doesn't want to elevate anyone or anything 'feminine,' in that way: a figure like this statue, though, they could sure have used to claim to be some rightful rulers of the world who'd been suppressed by some masses of 'inferiors' etc etc. Things like Nazism tend to require a certain appeal to hypermasculinity in order to appeal to frustrated dominance instincts, that's one reason there's always so much about 'women in their place' and who controls breeding and the like: also why they rounded up gay people or anyone they wanted to call such and sent them to the gas chambers: it's also worth noting that the Roma people who'd always been disfavored anyway would have a better claim to be descended of the 'Aryans' than would the Germans, according to what was known by most at the time. (They were called 'Gypsies' because they used to claim to be descended of Egyptians in order to fit into the sense of history of the Middle Ages and later: as a 'Biblical' people. But that very refusal to assimilate to various means of control was always something that made them unpopular with authorities. ) )
Which is a lot of detail about why a lot is made of trying to distance the Nazi tilted swastika (probably more a design decision than a symbolic one, however ironic, there: quartered circles in one form or another appear pretty much worldwide, as symbolizing Earth and time and the intersection of worlds, early Nazi logos didn't have that tilt to them,) from, particularly, its use in Hindu practices: it's meant to connote a wheel, among other things, anyway, but obviously, perception of the symbol's been heavily tainted by its use in hate and atrocity. It's possible that the tilted version was meant to represent the turning of a great age, but if so, I like to think the SOBs got more than they bargained for on that count. I also think it's not a lesson the world's fully-learned yet, when it comes to people waving flags and symbols and the like around, but there's more to that than a misappropriated symbol.
Quote: But what about his left hand? What is he holding?
Can't really see, but it appears to be some kind of vessel, such as you see in that region.