Originally posted by les3547 I'd agree about most of that crowd, but I've always thought (even before he endorsed Obama) that Powell was duped by his associates and acted in good faith on the Iraq thing (as did Hillary when she supported the invasion). On the other hand, at the time I was against the invasion, and like much of the rest of the world thought the inspectors should be given more time; so IMO far too many were more war-prone than we should have been.
First off, I am a huge fan of Colin Powell, and wish more republicans (and democrats) were like him (i.e. moderate, thoughtful, diplomatic, and excellent leadership skills).
As for Iraq, I do not think he was duped. After listening to some interviews from Colin Powell after the Iraq war, I think he saw himself as having an advisory role. From what I can tell from his accounts he advised Bush that the Iraq war would not necessarily be easy and that he should take further diplomatic efforts. I got the feeling that he did not really want war with Iraq, but was willing to support the president through whatever decision he made (and I think the fact that he "resigned" after that presidential term shows he did not totally agree with everything that was going on).
I suppose you cold consider him duped by the intelligence he was given, though.