Originally posted by audiobomber LOL! Jeffkrol, hardcore to the bitter end. You didn't say where you'll be posting your P&R materials.
I didn't think this forum would interest me when I started reading, but American politics is such a calamity that I've been very entertained almost daily for about a year. That's why I will continue to participate in PF, but I will have a look at the DPR off-topic forum to see if it holds my attention.
Not sure.. facebook bores me............
http://www.facebook.com/jeff.seussalias
This is not THE ONLY place but it WAS the nicest............. (APPARENTLY that is a matter of opinion)
Political forums are always sooo one sided......................
Politics is like discussing "BIG" pixels vs little pixels.. and just as mis-understood.......
Quote: The maximum amount of light captured per unit of area, and the sensitivity per unit of area, have not been greatly different for the smallest and largest pixels with the benefit often being to the smaller pixels, with technology of the same age. It's a simple idea, easy to visualize, but has not recently been an issue. Why do you think that P&S cameras of several years ago had less highlight headroom at ISO 100 than DSLRs did? It's because they had higher QE, and saturated with less exposure, even though the maximum collectible light per unit of sensor area was about the same.
John Sheey