Originally posted by dansamy My husband's theory is that every other Windows release is a stable, retail release.
He's not alone with that theory, and my experience confirms it, although I doubt it's a conspiracy to get more money out of the suckers who run companies these days, more like the choice between conspiracy and stuff-up, amplified by geeks being bullied by an technologically-ignorant CEO into releasing something to suit a marketing timeline developed in isolation from reality.
Originally posted by DJB77 Windows 8 is not really that bad.
How bad does it have to be? Some people had no issues with Vista, either, but it seems like it was a lottery as to who did and who didn't, and Win8 is shaping up to be much the same. Whether the lottery is determined by hardware or star sign is anyone's guess, but the overall experience with Win8 seems to be one a developer wouldn't want on their CV.
To the OP, I'd suggest watching what government agencies do with OS versions, especially ones keen to maintain security, and go with what they choose. They may be slow to adapt, but they're keener than ever to resist moving just for the sake of being up with the latest, your government's universal healthcare scheme notwithstanding, of course (nice idea, lousy software implementation).