Originally posted by carpents Rupert, is it possible that he would have been more cautious without a helmet?
A 21 year old male, Cadet at Texas A&M, leader of the Corp of Cadets, having spent the past 4 years convincing himself and his classmates that they were above the crowd, and indestructible. It is doubtful that a little helmet gave him any more caution or sense than was already present....(which wasn't much!
) Under those circumstances, your own youth can get you killed easily.
Although the helmet lesson did change his attitude (and everyone elses, including my son) it had little effect on other actions on that trip. The next day they were rafting down the RIo Grande and cliff jumping like they had defeated death, and fear, so must truly be invincible.
Short answer to your question...No, wearing the helmet was not a factor in his accident, except to save his life.
On the other hand, Mrs Rupert, was cautious to the extreme, and still took few chances. She had on so much protection she could have survived a head on crash with an 18 wheeler!
The funniest (to me) part of the ride that day was when I came back down the trail looking for her, and found she had crossed a little sandy dry creek in a ravine, lost control and her little Honda 100 was hanging in a Mesquite tree by the front wheel...still running, and she was sitting on a rock, uninjured and crying.
Youth in itself is a deterrent to safety and common sense.....it was for me too. When you get older, you wise up, or you get some bad "breaks"...or worse.
Those crazy riders you see weaving and going 120 on the freeway in heavy traffic......if you get a good look at them as they buzz by you, few if any are old guys like me!
Regards!