Well, Mags, there's homeless people and then there's panhandlers. "What if it's a scammer or addict" doesn't apply if someone's not actually panhandling. So if you're seeking out places to do personal do-gooding, it's not like you have to micromanage that way. To the extent that much-vaunted charities exist, (Not so much as they say, especially if you're homeless for the same reasons people claim they're OK to do that to people cause they throw some food on the holidays, but even apart from that,) A holiday comes around and people's thoughts turn to the homeless and hungry, ...it's hardly bad to want people to not die while you're feasting, but it's also a time where people just don't 'live by bread alone' as some say.
If you'd ever been homeless, and/or spent a lot of time near to homeless, you might understand that someone who looks in occasionally might just not know, either the daily struggles or exactly what kind of details could save someone's night, or month, or year: like even if you could get to and get into the Rosie's Place feast that the media always made a big deal of, to show that the homeless were having a good time too, (as long as they approve of you, and before they ran out of space, and if you the homeless person doesn't think someone else needs a big meal more than you do if only you could give them the T fare... )
Basics of living are needed all over the place, but this trope that you may as well be buying someone crack if you gave someone funds, or, Hel, a gift card and bus fare to Wal-mart, say, if you're going out of your way to help the homeless, is very much mistaken. If you want to provide the basics, set up *systems* equal to the actual scope of the problem. If you want to be giving on a holiday, be the wildcard. Even if it's just 'You don't have to worry about tobacco tonight' it could be something. Something a real human being could work with.
The idea that private charity somehow feeds all the homeless left out by the system is of course BS. And every time they actually *test* people receiving public assistance for drugs they find out that ...No, not as many poor people are on drugs as you think. Actually almost none by percentage of those actually receiving aid.
When I was homeless, I was not the kind of person the churches cared for. The Sally Ann was actively hostile, in fact, seen as a price of failure if you had to ask them. You didn't. You'd go cold or hungry first just to keep your shred of humanity that wouldn't lie for her supper, never mind submit to what went on there.
So there I was, a homeless person. Yeah, missing meals was routine. If at any point there, if someone had dropped a couple rolls of Tri-X and a bag of D-76 in my lap, maybe one of these Canonet GIIIs that got some cachet later (Ironically cause a homeless person used a cheaper model,) but which I used to fix for other people, ....no one could give them away then but now they are worth bucks. Wish I'd kept some.
) .....well, maybe that'd have been something. Something I couldn't do otherwise. No one could possibly know what that was, not just from looking at some ratlady and I didn't panhandle. But if someone had ever put cash in my hand, that could have gone right to where I left off, "Hey, I'm out here in the dark, I may as well push a lot of film.'
I mean, a)You can't know what someone needs on an immediate basis or why, and b) You don't know what thing they're good at that their soul might need to do, ....I think that's worth the risk that what someone homeless needs most immediately is a drink or tobbacco, never mind drugs. People who are on drugs or are sociopathic enough to fake poverty to beg will come after *you.*