Originally posted by UncleVanya What's made this happen?
In general it is time to reduce the insane amount of gear I have to user items only plus the K lenses and Accessories
Collection. I had allocated an amount of money to Buying / Trying / Selling / Buying / Trying Selling all the old gear I had dreamt about perusing sales material in the 70’s - 90’s. I’ve grossly exceeded the money limit so it is time to sell the things I’m not using. The end game is a much smaller ‘bag’ of gear. KP and pancakes, plus the DA* zooms and a small number of FF lenses. I think I have over 30 film cameras. I can’t use them all even once a year. I’ll keep a few.
I decided to make the KP my casual camera for grandkids, walking around and travel because it is such a good picture maker with the Accelerator Chip. I didn’t upgrade my K-1 because I don’t think I need two A.C.’s. I will use K-1 primarily with K lenses specifically to shoot them on FF digital, which was the original plan. I might upgrade to K-1ll nearer its end-of-life pricing if that happens. I might even sell the DA Limiteds and just use FA Limiteds on both cameras, but HD and 9 blades is a ‘keeping’ feature.
The DFA lenses, particularly the 15-30 and *70-200 are simply too bulky, heavy and cumbersome to use on a casual basis. I need a monopod just to properly handle them, so I bought used DA* lenses to replace them equivalence-wise. That sets up the issue of the DFA lenses being so much better than the DA* lenses that I can’t have APSc and the best zooms (for convenience and usability) - particularly the DA*16-50 vs. DFA 24-70. For now I’ll keep the DFA*70-200 but eventually it will also be sold (the 50-135 is special I it’s own right) and keep the DFA24-70 permanently. $350 each for the DA*’s makes keeping them an easy choice.
Short answer, financial responsibility and satisfaction of my original goal. Long answer, usability and not enough time and skill to warrant tieing up money in professional quality lenses when there is a PDG alternative.