Originally posted by Liney I have to say that when I post an image that I think is good enough to share, it gets frustrating that it can get dozens (or even hundreds) of views but no comments.
I'm always interested in what the individual's motive is for sharing images (especially as I very rarely post my own).
Is it simply to please others? If so, no likes or comments are necessary... the act of sharing is enough, right? Appreciation is nice, but not required...
Is it to receive recognition or praise? If so, the photo has to be good enough - and that's a big ask, given the quality of many photos here and the individual tastes of our extremely broad membership...
Is it to receive constructive critique? If so, the photo needs to be presented with a clear and specific request for feedback...
Is it to receive encouragement, perhaps as an incentive to continue along the same lines and improve? If so, as with constructive technique, that needs to be clearly stated.
These are my personal opinions, of course - not statements of fact
As I mentioned, I tend not to post many of my own photos - actually very, very few of them. On the rare occasions that I do, it's purely because I feel that others (perhaps only a minority) might enjoy them or find some value in them, and I don't expect likes or comments (though both are, of course, welcome and appreciated). I'm never disappointed if none, or few, are received.
I hope no-one here takes this as criticism... I love that members can and do post photos, and I
do look at some of them... though, without any specific requests, I can only make generally positive comments, or none at all