Originally posted by photoptimist It depends on the readers' intuitive familiarity with units of the material and the writer's communication goals.
OK. I would never have thought that it was necessary to use a smaller measurement but I take your point.
Quote: ... sounds more impressive than just 3 gigagrams.
Which isn't an SI unit so no self-respecting writer would use it. I get your point, and it confirms what I suspected; that the writer is choosing a unit of measure to make it sound impressive. I posted because I was curious whether the inconsistency in using inappropriate measurements was endemic or just peculiar to this situation. Metric measurements aren't used entirely consistently around the world. For example, in France, cans of drink have measurements on them in centilitres, and I've never seen that measurement used outside France. In Japan, the news reports give wind speeds in metres per second rather than kilometres per hour. In Australia we measure fuel economy in litres per 100 kilometres to mangle it into a range of numbers similar to miles per gallon, while in Japan they use the more logical kilometres per litre (literally translating miles per gallon into SI units). I'll have to look at some news articles to see if I can spot writers expressing weights in thousands or millions of kilograms rather than tonnes.
Originally posted by stevebrot * If the rear flaps are dragging, I know I overdid it.
I thought you were talking about a plane for a moment when I saw this out of context.
Originally posted by stevebrot It depends on who one is trying to impress
Tons sounds more impressive when applied to vehicles or when the number is greater than ten and when the weight easily converts to a round number sum. It helps that people tend to not know that a ton is 2000 pounds unless they actually deal in weights in that range. For most, it just means really heavy.
Interesting!
Originally posted by jeallen01 Has anyone mentioned the metric
tonne, i.e, 1000 kgs or 2204.6226218 lbs, and thus 10% bigger than the US ton and about 36 lbs less than the Imperial ton? AFAIK, most of the World's countries use the metric version!
I was trying to avoid stirring up an argument about metric versus non-metric. I was just curious that pounds were being used rather than tons, because I'd never use kilos where tonnes were required. I can actually remember when Australia's road signs changed from miles to kilometres, and I grew up during the transition, so I at least have an idea in my head of what the imperial measurements meant. It's confusing that US measurements are different from imperial while using the same terms, especially the difference in gallons.