Originally posted by luftfluss The big issue is the mastering.
It's the only reason to prefer vinyl to CDs, the human ear can't distinguish 14 bit digital music from pristine analog 33 1/3 RPM vinyl (so there isn't any dust popping and cracking to serve as clues) if the final mastering is identical. What makes many CDs and compressed digital audio sound artificial is mastering done for commercial reasons that sounds noticeably different than an analog vinyl disc that we accept to be the reference. If CDs were available before vinyl LPs, we would be complaining about lower dynamic range and distortion from adjacent grooves (not to mention the effects of stylus wear and noise from dust and dirt). The reason the early Beatles LPs released in the U.S. by Capitol sound so crappy is because Capitol executive Dave Dexter, Jr. wanted 1958 style reverb added, maybe to make them sound more American or because he thought the EMI mastering would never sell in the U.S.
Early on in the history of CDs, the music industry decided to boost amplitude compared to LPs, probably to help get more volume out of portable CD players, but it sounded too brassy for those of us who had invested all of our part-time income in direct drive turntables, high end cartridges, NAD amplifiers and speakers that cost as much as the beaters we drove. Compressed digital audio is mastered to suit automotive stereo systems and micro-powered portable players with tiny earbuds; it isn't just the data that gets grossly compressed.
It should also be mentioned that the per unit value of LPs is more than double that of CDs, so in the linked article, unit sales of LPs is less than half of CDs. Back in the days when a single LP could sell in the same quantities as the entire industry does today, the vinyl disc was thinner and more prone to warping. It's a shame my hearing has deteriorated to the point where I can't appreciate the better quality of today's vinyl.