Originally posted by aslyfox I live in Shawnee County
half measures make no sense:
we either need to not gather, or gathering is ok
Well, yes and no. It is not about not getting infected, it is about people not all getting infected at the same time so the hospitals do not get overloaded.
So IF (and this is where the "yes" part comes into play, because currently no model is that good at predicting the spread rendering the decissions bs indeed) a lighter restriction is enough to slow it down sufficiantly for the hospitals to work through all patients it is ok to only restrict it in some areas.
The issue is, people making decissions that do not know enough about the topic, a common problem of politics. In the Netherlands they want to build up immunity in the young generation by only sepperating the old ones. At this point there is no clear evidence if immunity from this virus is achievable at all. Further problems are the only about 1000 beds for intensive care for 18 million people in the Netherlands, that have over 80% usage without the virus already. So even the young generation with much less complications will not be able to get enough room in the hospital. Why is it like this? Because a single consultant told the premier its the "current state of science" and the best thing to do.
This is an interesting thought, but there is at this point not a single studie showing enough evidence and this is certainly not the current state of pandemic sciences, only a very niche thing.
I am not saying this has to be wrong for sure, but this is like going all in with 15% aquity against a poker player that calls for sure.