Originally posted by swanlefitte I would love to see stats based on population clusters, density, and per capita. For instance NY state population has 43% in NY city. But it could be 95% of cases and tests are from that 43%. New Orleans is less than 25% of LA.
Those English city stats do better but without per capita is hard to make anything out of. If Leeds has 10% less cases than London, Leeds is much worse, etc.
Originally posted by Parallax I refer you to the second line in my signature.
I can't help with the additional breakdowns on numbers. I will repeat, though, the UK is about the size of a decent US state. The regions listed in the stats I gave are probably the geographic size of many US counties. As such, population clusters have - IMHO - little meaning here, since everywhere tends to merge into everywhere else (OK, maybe that's a slight exaggeration, but it's not far from the truth).
Perhaps the stats are less helpful than I thought. Numbers aside, the University of Cambridge has predicted that our hospital intensive care unit beds will be completely filled within 14 days due to critical coronavirus patients. So, at that point, additional folks that need these beds - whether they're infected by COVID-19 or not - won't receive the necessary treatment. So far as regional breakdown of that is concerned, unsurprisingly it's London that will run out of beds first...