Originally posted by pres589 I think this is going to roll around for a while due to reports of people who had covid-19, eventually recovered from it, and then tested positive again.
I don't think America is remotely close to responding as it should and I don't think we have the ability to at a federal level. I would agree that the presidential speech yesterday here in the USA was "powerful" but not in a good way.
Hopefully I can start working from home this week but not sure if my employer will allow it.
Indeed! The country is infected with a much more serious illness known as rampant scientific illiteracy.
It's a text book case of how to ensure an infection spreads through out a population:
1) squander the warning time by assuming this was just a problem for China
2) lock the henhouse door after the foxes have entered
3) pretend that if we don't test people, then the number of infections can't go up
4) insist that confidence has anti-viral properties
Viruses are remarkably simple (but effective) replication machines. It doesn't take a lot of data to figure out how infectious (and fatal) a new one can be and forecast what it can do if it is allowed to spread. All it takes in some high school math to forecast how the numbers of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths with rise over time. And all it takes is a little data on size of the US healthcare system to see the potential for an extremely serious mismatch in the ratio of people needing a hospital bed or ICU versus the numbers of spare beds & ICUs.
From there, any scientifically-literate leader could have known what to do over two months ago to contain and delay the spread.
I'd post this old
xkcd: Sickness but fear the final word is not safe for sensitive ears.