Originally posted by bertwert More grammatical, but a few things that really get to me are "off of" and "could/would/should of":
Ex:
The book could of fallen off of the table.
Wrong! The book could have fallen off the table!
But they're will always be people who make mistakes
I believe you mean "But their will always be people who make mistakes", no?
As I've said before, I almost had a heart attack
the first time I came across "Should of", and it still has me fuming when I see it
. I understand the sound is similar to what it should be, but the writer must have gone to school to be able to write (and read) in the first place, so how do you not know that there is no such thing?
---------- Post added 09-07-20 at 09:25 ----------
Originally posted by Benz3ne Depends on context:
"Fred and I went to the market." Correct.
"It's very important to Fred and I." Incorrect.
Remove Fred (or your daughter) and the sentence should still read correctly, which is not the case for the second example.
Oh yeah, that's another one that drives me crazy, because it is so prevalent, everyone on TV overuses "Fred and I". I believe it all stems from the time kids (and some adults) used to say (and many still do) "me and Fred...", and mom would correct them to "Fred and I". OK, so far so good. But somehow, this carried over to being used even when it is the object of a sentence, rather than the subject. Drives me up a freaking wall! "The man gave the books to Fred and I". Really? The man gave the books to I?
OK, I better stop here...