Originally posted by Rondec I don't think the point of the study is to say that COVID vaccines cure non-COVID problems. I certainly don't read it that way. The CDC took a bunch of people who had gotten the mRNA vaccines (4 million), a couple million who had gotten J and J's shot, and compared them to two million unvaccinated people who had gotten a flu shot in one of the last two years. They excluded any deaths that happened within 30 days of a positive COVID test and then compared mortality between the three groups.
Mortality rate for the mRNA vaccines was about 0.4 per 100 person years, it was 0.84 per 100 person years with the Janssen vaccine, and 1.47 per 100 person years for the unvaccinated group. There was no difference for the 12-17 year old groups.
To me, the point is simply to say that COVID vaccines do not have a high level of unreported mortality. That's all. A study which looks at several million people over this period of time is certainly going to pick up if there is an underlying danger to the vaccines that is just not being reported. This isn't to say that the vaccines don't have reactions and side effects, I'm sure they do, but there is no smoking gun here to indicate some underlying problem with them.
COVID-19 Vaccination and Non?COVID-19 Mortality Risk ? Seven Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 14, 2020?July 31, 2021 | MMWR
I think there are a couple of possible explanations that they mention in their discussion. (1) People who get vaccinated are probably more likely to seek medical attention for various things and less likely to engage in risky behaviors. We may just be sorting out people based on their willingness to take care of themselves. The reason for choosing a comparison group with people who had gotten at least one flu shot in the last couple of years was to mitigate that somewhat, but it is still possible. (2) There are some underlying health conditions that are just more prevalent in the unvaccinated comparator group that weren't identified. (3) Some of this is undiagnosed COVID -- that is to say, a certain amount of sudden death is related to COVID blood clots and even though the people hadn't gotten tested for COVID, their deaths were actually attributable to this diagnosis. If someone died and had not gotten a positive COVID test, they were included in the study.
I think what Serkevan mentions is also a possibility. Someone gets COVID and that starts a spiral which ends up killing them after the thirty day window -- worsened heart failure, chronic lung disease, etc.
I think the study points out just what you said, nobody’s dying from MRNA vaccines as lots of these misinformation sites claim. And that the person who gets vaccinated for covid, likely did for lots of other things and probably is more careful with their health in general. As the numbers suggest in the study.
What a lot of people, at least in the USA who are anti vaccine are not looking at is the breakdown in deaths by political affiliation. That shows the real damage of all this misinformation. Last I looked it was about 7x as many on one side dying as the other. So following misinformation has consequences that are very real for family’s on one side of the political spectrum.
As mentioned if this is a conspiracy of the CDC and United States government to sell Pfizer products, then why is the rest of the world doing the same thing? Are they that powerful to have global control over everyone? What about the other manufacturers, are they in league? China and Russia too?
It’s just way to much conspiracy to be pulled off by human beings.
The reality is it’s a global pandemic and we have vaccines that aren’t perfect but offer protection and are proven safe. We still have to see how well they hold up over the long run but that requires time and data.
As for CDC updates. They added that masks in use should be N95/FFP2/KN95 types and not cloth. But nobody seems to be paying attention there. Upgrade your masks as cloth never was very effective (it was a stop gap to prevent N95 supply depletion) and Delta makes that much more so. Just look at South Korea, heavy KN95 use and 45-65x less deaths adjusted for population than the United States. That is pretty strong evidence that proper masks work. If USA had that level of mask wearing with KN95’s (and not hanging under noses in protest) we would probably have had about 700,000 less deaths. Think about that.
If anyone should be a shining example of how to handle a pandemic it’s South Korea.
As for the USA, if I were our enemy’s I would be investing in bioweapon development with the new CRISPR and gain of function on virus’s. We are wide open vulnerable as proven by the last year and a half. And some states have banned future public health measures, playing into the advantage of a bioweapon attack. With something like MRNA vaccine it’s entirely plausible to engineer a virus and vaccine in tandem and utilize it against your enemy. It would be untraceable and create no environmental damage should you want those resources after. You could easily do this with covid as we have a large portion of the population who would refuse to get vaccinated as you ramped up the lethality of the virus in slow updated releases. Like boiling a frog.